FordFirst

Fordnatics List Archive

Smashed rear lamp lens

. Become a Supporting Member to hide the ad above & support a small business
mailbot Avatar
mailbot Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA   USA
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: "Rimmer, Paul" <(email redacted)>


The right rear lamp lens on my '93 LX was smashed yesterday. Ford wants
$142 Canadian. Does anyone know if these are the same from '87 on up ? If
so I will try to get one from a wreckers yard.


Was this post helpful or interesting?
Yes No Thank
. Become a Supporting Member to hide the ad above & support a small business
mailbot Avatar
mailbot Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA   USA
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: Chuck Fry <(email redacted)>

There's not much to the job; you'll have to get access behind the
interior panels at the rear of the cargo area, as there are several
screws holding the lenses on.

The seal really does need to be replaced if the car is more than a year
or two old, as it takes a set. On my '85 Mustang, there was some
tarlike sealer substance that had to be replaced. I don't know if the
'87-up cars still use this stuff.
-- Chuck




Was this post helpful or interesting?
Yes No Thank
mailbot Avatar
mailbot Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA   USA
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: "Anderson, Thomas L (Tommy)" <(email redacted)>


Paul Wrote:

The right rear lamp lens on my '93 LX was smashed yesterday. Ford wants
$142 Canadian. Does anyone know if these are the same from '87 on up ? If
so I will try to get one from a wreckers yard.

Best I can tell, the LX lens are the same from '83 on up (for Foxes).


Was this post helpful or interesting?
Yes No Thank
mailbot Avatar
mailbot Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA   USA
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: (email redacted) (Tony Wasson)

At 01:14 PM 5/23/95 -0700, Chuck Fry wrote:
>...On my '85 Mustang, there was some tarlike sealer substance
> that had to be replaced.

That's the butyl. Any glass shop will have it by the roll too. Silicon works
well also.
- -----
Tony Wasson, Editor Voice (520) 782-7115 | Out of the 10Base-T card, thru
Desert Computing, Fax (520) 783-2056 | the Bridge, off the Router, over
Web -> primenet.com/~twasson/ | the Backbone, Nothing but 'Net.





Was this post helpful or interesting?
Yes No Thank
. Become a Supporting Member to hide the ad above & support a small business
mailbot Avatar
mailbot Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA   USA
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: (email redacted)

On Tuesday, May 23rd, Paul Rimmer wrote

(lots of stuff snipped)

>"price includes the butyl seal and retainers. I'm not sure if the old
>retainers can be used again. Are these pieces use once, then throw >away,
items ?

>If anyone has replaced the lenses on their car and has any advice could >you
please drop me a line. Thanks."

The only advice I can offer relates to the use of the butyl seal. DON'T FORGET
IT.

I have had to re-replace the rear lens of a non-Ford vehicle and the reason
for the redo was the lack of seal by the previous installer. The car was used
and kept leaking around the backend and filling with water when it rained.
Finnally, I figured out that the water was coming in around the rear lens. I
used clear silicone and presto chango, no more leak. Best of luck!



Was this post helpful or interesting?
Yes No Thank
. Become a Supporting Member to hide the ad above & support a small business

Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.

Having trouble posting or changing forum settings?
Read the Forum Help (FAQ) or click Contact Support at the bottom of the page.



. Become a Supporting Member to hide the ad above & support a small business


Join The Club
Sign in to ask questions, share photos, and access all website features
Your Cars
1965 Ford Falcon
Text Size
Larger Smaller
Reset Save