Fordnatics List Archive
351 Clevelands - questions...
Posted by mailbot
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Dec 9, 1994 03:37 PM
Joined 15 years ago
59,279 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: (email redacted) (Scott Fleming x255)
Hello everyone,
After reading a post from Dan Jones regarding Clevelands,
I since have a couple of questions. By the way, thanks for
the info Dan!
1. What is the difference between 351C 2V and 4V heads?
2. Can/Has anyone convert the 351C to accept EFI? I'm pretty
new to this and was wondering if I could put the Cleveland
heads on a 351W, then add the GT-40 intake, and EFI...
3. I hear that the Cleveland heads flow rrreal good, are they better
than most aftermarket heads(GT-40, Darts, Edlebrok...)
4. Whats the common setup? 351C heads on a 351W block. Can I
use the cleveland head with a 302?
It seems that everything I hear about the Cleveland is that the
heads are great, flow great, high RPM, lots of oil/cooling problems,
not great at idle or on the street...
There is one thing for sure, there is not a lot of information out there
on them. Not many people are doing buildups with them...
Thanks for any information, have a good weekend.
-scottf
95 Windstar
90 Escort
89 Mustang LX 302
Mail From: (email redacted) (Scott Fleming x255)
Hello everyone,
After reading a post from Dan Jones regarding Clevelands,
I since have a couple of questions. By the way, thanks for
the info Dan!
1. What is the difference between 351C 2V and 4V heads?
2. Can/Has anyone convert the 351C to accept EFI? I'm pretty
new to this and was wondering if I could put the Cleveland
heads on a 351W, then add the GT-40 intake, and EFI...
3. I hear that the Cleveland heads flow rrreal good, are they better
than most aftermarket heads(GT-40, Darts, Edlebrok...)
4. Whats the common setup? 351C heads on a 351W block. Can I
use the cleveland head with a 302?
It seems that everything I hear about the Cleveland is that the
heads are great, flow great, high RPM, lots of oil/cooling problems,
not great at idle or on the street...
There is one thing for sure, there is not a lot of information out there
on them. Not many people are doing buildups with them...
Thanks for any information, have a good weekend.
-scottf
95 Windstar
90 Escort
89 Mustang LX 302
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Dec 9, 1994 06:01 PM
Joined 15 years ago
59,279 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: chucko (Chuck Fry)
As long as we're at it, one other question for the Cleveland
cognoscienti. I have this vague recollection that the 351M and 400 use
Cleveland-style heads, comparable to the early 351C-2V heads except for
a bigger combustion chamber. Am I confused?
-- Chuck
Mail From: chucko (Chuck Fry)
As long as we're at it, one other question for the Cleveland
cognoscienti. I have this vague recollection that the 351M and 400 use
Cleveland-style heads, comparable to the early 351C-2V heads except for
a bigger combustion chamber. Am I confused?
-- Chuck
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Dec 9, 1994 05:56 PM
Joined 15 years ago
59,279 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: (email redacted) (Dave Williams)
-> cognoscienti. I have this vague recollection that the 351M and 400
-> use Cleveland-style heads, comparable to the early 351C-2V heads
-> except for a bigger combustion chamber. Am I confused?
Since you're sitting on the Ford Head FYI it should be easy enough to
check. <grin>
Mail From: (email redacted) (Dave Williams)
-> cognoscienti. I have this vague recollection that the 351M and 400
-> use Cleveland-style heads, comparable to the early 351C-2V heads
-> except for a bigger combustion chamber. Am I confused?
Since you're sitting on the Ford Head FYI it should be easy enough to
check. <grin>
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Dec 12, 1994 09:28 AM
Joined 15 years ago
59,279 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: Kelly Murray <(email redacted)>
> As long as we're at it, one other question for the Cleveland
> cognoscienti. I have this vague recollection that the 351M and 400 use
> Cleveland-style heads, comparable to the early 351C-2V heads except for
> a bigger combustion chamber. Am I confused?
No confusion. This makes open-chamber 351C-2v type heads abundant
at the wrecking yards. Lots of LTD wagons with 400's sitting around
waiting for somebody to do something with.
And frankly, why not build a 400? They are heavier than the 351W,
but you've already got a 4" stroke and 400ci, and those heavy breathing
heads. Pop on the early closed-chamber heads to get the compression up
to performance standards, and should be a good runner for low bucks.
A little extra stroking fun with perhaps some off-the-shelf parts,
and get maybe 427ci. They are a lot shorter than the 460's, which
would given them a much better weight-transfer fit
in the late-model Mustangs. C'mon, someone out there must want to
build something no one else has...
-Kelly Murray (email redacted)
'72 Mustang 460 Gainesville, Florida
Mail From: Kelly Murray <(email redacted)>
> As long as we're at it, one other question for the Cleveland
> cognoscienti. I have this vague recollection that the 351M and 400 use
> Cleveland-style heads, comparable to the early 351C-2V heads except for
> a bigger combustion chamber. Am I confused?
No confusion. This makes open-chamber 351C-2v type heads abundant
at the wrecking yards. Lots of LTD wagons with 400's sitting around
waiting for somebody to do something with.
And frankly, why not build a 400? They are heavier than the 351W,
but you've already got a 4" stroke and 400ci, and those heavy breathing
heads. Pop on the early closed-chamber heads to get the compression up
to performance standards, and should be a good runner for low bucks.
A little extra stroking fun with perhaps some off-the-shelf parts,
and get maybe 427ci. They are a lot shorter than the 460's, which
would given them a much better weight-transfer fit
in the late-model Mustangs. C'mon, someone out there must want to
build something no one else has...

-Kelly Murray (email redacted)
'72 Mustang 460 Gainesville, Florida
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.
Having trouble posting or changing forum settings?
Read the Forum Help (FAQ) or click Contact Support at the bottom of the page.



