FordFirst

Classic Mustangs List Archive

cam and cylinder head questions

. Become a Supporting Member to hide the ad above & support a small business
mailbot Avatar
mailbot Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA   USA
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: The Andersons (email redacted)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_000D_01BFDDEB.15103520
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I have two question regarding cam selection for my 67` 302 mustang. =
What is the highest amount of lift I can safely have with =
pressed-in-studs on my heads? A few months ago, a discussion on your =
digest covered the topic of distributor and cam gear compatability. I =
can't remember the details but, which material is compatable and which =
material is not compatable with a stock distributor gear?

Thanks,

Todd =20

------=_NextPart_000_000D_01BFDDEB.15103520
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>I have two question regarding cam selection for my =
67` 302=20
mustang.&nbsp; What is the highest amount of lift I can safely have with =

pressed-in-studs on my heads?&nbsp; A few months ago, a discussion on =
your=20
digest covered the topic of distributor and cam gear =
compatability.&nbsp; I=20
can't remember the details but,&nbsp;which material&nbsp;is compatable =
and which=20
material&nbsp;is not compatable with a stock distributor =
gear?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Todd&nbsp; </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_000D_01BFDDEB.15103520--


_______________________________________________
Classic-mustangs mailing list
(email redacted)
mix.twistedpair.ca/mailman/listinfo/classic-mustangs



Was this post helpful or interesting?
Yes No Thank
mailbot Avatar
mailbot Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA   USA
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: (email redacted) (email redacted)

In a message dated 6/24/2000 3:56:51 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
(email redacted) writes:

> I have two question regarding cam selection for my 67` 302 mustang. What
is
> the highest amount of lift I can safely have with pressed-in-studs on my
> heads?

Todd

It isn't just the cam selection, it's the whole combination. Pushrods,
rocker arms, installed valve stem height and valve springs all have an effect
on the strees impressed upon the stud.

Personally, I think going with anything more radical than a .500 lift (with
the proper springs rods etc) on press-in studs is asking for heartache. YMMV

Tom C
'65 k fastback (14.7's today on new motor with greasy track and rusty driver)
'82GT

_______________________________________________
Classic-mustangs mailing list
(email redacted)
mix.twistedpair.ca/mailman/listinfo/classic-mustangs



Was this post helpful or interesting?
Yes No Thank
. Become a Supporting Member to hide the ad above & support a small business

Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.

Having trouble posting or changing forum settings?
Read the Forum Help (FAQ) or click Contact Support at the bottom of the page.



. Become a Supporting Member to hide the ad above & support a small business


Join The Club
Sign in to ask questions, share photos, and access all website features
Your Cars
1926 Ford Model T
Text Size
Larger Smaller
Reset Save