Classic Mustangs List Archive
Autolite 4300 D2VF-AA
Posted by mailbot
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Oct 8, 2008 06:38 PM
Joined 15 years ago
59,279 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: brandon (Brandon Peskin)
I've got an opportunity to purchase this carb. It came from a 72
Lincoln Mk3 with the 429.
I can't find any definitive information on the 'net about the venturi
size, CFM, etc (only a site stating the "bore" is 1.25). Does anyone
have a book with this data offhand or any first hand experience?
Let me know when you can, thanks!
Mail From: brandon (Brandon Peskin)
I've got an opportunity to purchase this carb. It came from a 72
Lincoln Mk3 with the 429.
I can't find any definitive information on the 'net about the venturi
size, CFM, etc (only a site stating the "bore" is 1.25). Does anyone
have a book with this data offhand or any first hand experience?
Let me know when you can, thanks!
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Oct 8, 2008 06:39 PM
Joined 15 years ago
59,279 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: mustang (Brandon Peskin)
...and also how well suited this carb might be for a 289....
On Oct 8, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Brandon Peskin wrote:
> Let me know when you can, thanks!
Mail From: mustang (Brandon Peskin)
...and also how well suited this carb might be for a 289....
On Oct 8, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Brandon Peskin wrote:
> Let me know when you can, thanks!
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Oct 8, 2008 10:56 PM
Joined 15 years ago
59,279 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: walt (Walt Boeninger)
Hearsay says 4300 carbs are temperamental and hard to tune.
This is a 4300A I presume, and is a square bore...
I had a 4300D spread-bore on my 72 Mach I ... too many
years ago.... the lack of info on the web implies they
are rare or not that popular. I have the 72 Shop Manual
and it shows the 4300A and D, but not much info nor any specs
My $.02 says almost any other carb would make a better choice
than the 4300 for a 289.....
Brandon Peskin wrote:
> ...and also how well suited this carb might be for a 289....
> On Oct 8, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Brandon Peskin wrote:
>
>> Let me know when you can, thanks!
>
--
Regards
--------------
Walt Boeninger
walt at boeninger.net
webmaster at norcal-saac.org
shelbytransam.com
Mail From: walt (Walt Boeninger)
Hearsay says 4300 carbs are temperamental and hard to tune.
This is a 4300A I presume, and is a square bore...
I had a 4300D spread-bore on my 72 Mach I ... too many
years ago.... the lack of info on the web implies they
are rare or not that popular. I have the 72 Shop Manual
and it shows the 4300A and D, but not much info nor any specs
My $.02 says almost any other carb would make a better choice
than the 4300 for a 289.....
Brandon Peskin wrote:
> ...and also how well suited this carb might be for a 289....
> On Oct 8, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Brandon Peskin wrote:
>
>> Let me know when you can, thanks!
>
--
Regards
--------------
Walt Boeninger
walt at boeninger.net
webmaster at norcal-saac.org
shelbytransam.com
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Oct 8, 2008 11:31 PM
Joined 15 years ago
59,279 Posts
|
This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.
Mail From: mahilly (Mike H)
According to the *Ford Carburator Guide, 4th Edition* (by Pony Carbs):
In '72 the 4300 came on 429 and 460 V8's with 1.25 bore and 600CFM. The
model # you listed is in fact for the 72 Lincoln, but the book only lists
the 460 engine size, not the 429.
Production years for the 4300 were only from '67 thru '74. The 67 model was
one size rated at 441 CFM, which they say was about right for the 289
engine, and undersized for 390's and big blocks. In 68 they came out with
the 600 CFM for big blocks. The small bore version was discontinued in
1970. The 4300D spread bore (that Walt mentioned) was rated at 715 cfm
(1971 thru 74).
The 4300 model was Ford's answer to state and federal pressure for better
fuel economy, and with it came decreased performance compared to the 4100.
The 4100 is revered by some as the best 4 barrel carb ever made (I'm sure
some on this list would debate that claim though). I love my 4100
1.08, but it's the only 4 barrel carb I have ever owned, so I have no point
of comparison.
Hope this helps.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Brandon Peskin <brandon at peskin.org> wrote:
> I've got an opportunity to purchase this carb. It came from a 72
> Lincoln Mk3 with the 429.
>
> I can't find any definitive information on the 'net about the venturi
> size, CFM, etc (only a site stating the "bore" is 1.25). Does anyone
> have a book with this data offhand or any first hand experience?
>
> Let me know when you can, thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> Classic-mustangs mailing list
> Classic-mustangs at lists.twistedpair.ca
> lists.twistedpair.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/classic-mustangs
>
> Visit the Classic Mustang Wiki! sauce.donair.org/~cm/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: lists.twistedpair.ca/pipermail/classic-mustangs/attachments/20081008/c15c1bcb/attachment-0001.html
Mail From: mahilly (Mike H)
According to the *Ford Carburator Guide, 4th Edition* (by Pony Carbs):
In '72 the 4300 came on 429 and 460 V8's with 1.25 bore and 600CFM. The
model # you listed is in fact for the 72 Lincoln, but the book only lists
the 460 engine size, not the 429.
Production years for the 4300 were only from '67 thru '74. The 67 model was
one size rated at 441 CFM, which they say was about right for the 289
engine, and undersized for 390's and big blocks. In 68 they came out with
the 600 CFM for big blocks. The small bore version was discontinued in
1970. The 4300D spread bore (that Walt mentioned) was rated at 715 cfm
(1971 thru 74).
The 4300 model was Ford's answer to state and federal pressure for better
fuel economy, and with it came decreased performance compared to the 4100.
The 4100 is revered by some as the best 4 barrel carb ever made (I'm sure
some on this list would debate that claim though). I love my 4100
1.08, but it's the only 4 barrel carb I have ever owned, so I have no point
of comparison.
Hope this helps.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Brandon Peskin <brandon at peskin.org> wrote:
> I've got an opportunity to purchase this carb. It came from a 72
> Lincoln Mk3 with the 429.
>
> I can't find any definitive information on the 'net about the venturi
> size, CFM, etc (only a site stating the "bore" is 1.25). Does anyone
> have a book with this data offhand or any first hand experience?
>
> Let me know when you can, thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> Classic-mustangs mailing list
> Classic-mustangs at lists.twistedpair.ca
> lists.twistedpair.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/classic-mustangs
>
> Visit the Classic Mustang Wiki! sauce.donair.org/~cm/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: lists.twistedpair.ca/pipermail/classic-mustangs/attachments/20081008/c15c1bcb/attachment-0001.html
|
mailbot
Mail List Archive Bot
., Online, USA
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Oct 8, 2008 11:41 PM
Joined 15 years ago
59,279 Posts
|
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.
Having trouble posting or changing forum settings?
Read the Forum Help (FAQ) or click Contact Support at the bottom of the page.



