<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>Ford First Forum</title>
        <description>Welcome to your Online Ford Owners Club!&lt;br&gt;
Post your questions, introduction, photos, etc in our Forums</description>
        <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/index.php</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:38:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.15a</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?10,61067,61067#msg-61067</guid>
            <title>Piston Rings - Cortina, Zephyr, Zodiac, Consul, Granada [Bucks, GBR] (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?10,61067,61067#msg-61067</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I've a supply of (mainly) Cords piston rings for several classic Ford models. $20 plus postage from the UK (price will depend upon urgency!). Application as follows:<br />
Model	                                       cc	Bore inch	Size +<br />
Escort Anglia 105E Prefect 107E Thames Cortina 1300/1600 Escort 1300 &amp; GT Capri 1300/1600 &amp; GT Classic Corsair. Morgan 4/4 Series III-V	            940/997/1298/1340/1499/1599	3 3/16	        40<br />
Zephyr 6 Zodiac MKIII	                       2553	3 1/4	        Std<br />
Escort Cortina Capri Pinto Fiesta(1600)	940 1298 1599	3 3/16	        20<br />
Escort Cortina Capri Pinto Fiesta(1600)	940 1298 1599	3 3/16	        40<br />
Corsair V4 Zephyr 4 Capri GT Consul Transit 1663 1996	3 11/16	        30<br />
Corsair V4 Zephyr 4 Capri GT Consul Transit 1663 1996	3 11/16	        60<br />
Zephyr 6 Zodiac Capri  Consul Granada	    2495 2994	3 11/16	        20<br />
Zephyr 6 Zodiac Capri  Consul Granada	    2495 2994	3 11/16	        40<br />
Transit diesel	                            2358	93.647 (mm)     10<br />
Transit diesel	                            2358	93.647 (mm)	20]]></description>
            <dc:creator>afcneal</dc:creator>
            <category>Buy, Sell &amp; Trade Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 05:46:26 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?9,61066,61066#msg-61066</guid>
            <title>1934 Ford Model Y (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?9,61066,61066#msg-61066</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Heres a beauty for sale in Colorado.   Wish I was younger or at least more able bodied!<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.mgexp.com/phorum/read.php?42,2338045" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://www.mgexp.com/phorum/read.php?42,2338045</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>OldBloke</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford UK Market</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:53:57 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61060,61060#msg-61060</guid>
            <title>Celebrities in Fords (4 replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61060,61060#msg-61060</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Let's try this!  Post your photos of major &amp; minor public figures in classic Fords.<br />
<br />
To start, here's Annette Funicello with her custom painted purple 1957 Thunderbird, around 1963]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Chat Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 07:50:20 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61057,61057#msg-61057</guid>
            <title>ANGLIA 49'-53' (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61057,61057#msg-61057</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ WHY NO ANGLIA 49'-53' THAMES]]></description>
            <dc:creator>massena1</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Chat Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 23:47:50 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?4,61055,61055#msg-61055</guid>
            <title>1985 F150 XLT Lariat Tailgate letters (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?4,61055,61055#msg-61055</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Does anyone know where I can get the chrome letters that are on the tailgate panel?  Someone apparently thought they need the O &amp; R in Ford more than I.  I have been told that you have to buy the whole panel.  Any info will be appreciated.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Tom Warren</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Trucks</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:35:40 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?5,61053,61053#msg-61053</guid>
            <title>Any Mustang enthusiasm out there? (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?5,61053,61053#msg-61053</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Lets get some action on the Ford Mustang Forum. Lets see some of Mustangs out there.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>MoneyPit</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Mustang</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 22:17:14 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?10,61051,61051#msg-61051</guid>
            <title>FOR SALE 1967 Mustang GTA &amp;quot;S&amp;quot; Code Coupe [Wappingers Falls NY, USA] (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?10,61051,61051#msg-61051</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hello FF Guys &amp; Girls;<br />
   I have for sale for your consideration a numbers matching 67 Mustang GTA &quot;S&quot; code coupe. I chased this particular GTA for<br />
nearly 20 years, but as usually the case - the owner didn't want to sell &amp; had plans or should I say &quot;dreams&quot; of some day restoring it. Year after year passed at to no avail. I will say though, the gentleman was very nice &amp; would entertain me every time I stopped by, by showing me parts he'd been collecting. Then one day towards the end of last year I received the call,<br />
but not from the gentleman himself - but his wife. The gentleman had passed away &amp; his wife asked me if I was still interested<br />
in buying it - naturally I was &amp; didn't even try to barter the selling price.<br />
<br />
  To my amazement, the GTA started right up &amp; run great. Apparently the gentleman would start the GTA up monthly, let it run<br />
for an hour or so his wife said, kepted fresh gas in it &amp; even changed the oil yearly - he did this for over 20 years. He truly loved his Mustang. <br />
<br />
  A trip to the storage shed behind their house unvailed NOS quarter panels, inner/outer rear wheel houses, rear tail panel &amp; rear valance, floor pans &amp; other odd/ends - some of which I never saw on my visits. Needless to say, as a restorer - I was delighted. Nothing fits better then good used or NOS parts. <br />
<br />
  So over the past winter my son &amp; I repaired everything from the doors back, even being ever so careful not to ruin the original vinyl top. We painted the repaired areas with with the correct Springtime Yellow hue using PPG base/clear two part<br />
system. We also replaced the headliner, seat covers &amp; carpet. If the seat covers look old to you, that's because they were<br />
bought new some 10 to 15 years ago &amp; the patina was just right. Same is to be said for the carpet, although the headliner is<br />
new, new - as the one the gentleman bought was just too fragile. <br />
<br />
 We also recored the radiator, water pump, belts, hoses &amp; full tune-up. Boiled the gas tank to be on the safe side, blow out the fuel lines, replaced the fuel pump &amp; rebuilt the carburetor. Had the alternator rebuilt, changed the regulator &amp; replaced<br />
the starter, again to play it safe. <br />
<br />
 A full new dual exhaust system was put on, all the brakes were rebuilt, new seals/fuild in the rear end &amp; we serviced the<br />
transmission. I'm quite sure I'm forgetting some things, come's with old age - LOL. Oh yea, 4 new radial RWL tires &amp; 4 new<br />
shocks - told ya LOL.<br />
<br />
 Now to the rest of the body as we ran out of winter. Basically there's tiny rust bubbles at the corners of the doors outside,<br />
bottoms are very solid. Needs one small patch at the bottom of each fender. These areas are definitely repairable. The hood<br />
was damaged on the front lip something in it's pervious history &amp; the repair wasn't the greatest by any means. Yes it can be<br />
repaired, but if it with me doing the job - I'd locate a good used hood. I've used the reproductions out on the market &amp; it just takes to long getting them just right. To me not worth the added effort. <br />
<br />
  Well I believe that does it, I sure hope so - as I've been at it for well over an hour - LOL - no seriously if you have a question or two, please feel free to ask. I'd like to get $16,500.00 or something quite close. <br />
<br />
  Personal &amp; qualified 3rd party inspections are welcome. Overseas buyers are welcome. Photos available upon request. Contact Dan through this site or call 845-546-5523 up to 9pm EST. Located New York 12590 USA]]></description>
            <dc:creator>1MACH2NV</dc:creator>
            <category>Buy, Sell &amp; Trade Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:02:09 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61049,61049#msg-61049</guid>
            <title>Introduce Myself (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61049,61049#msg-61049</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hello FordFirst Family;<br />
    My name is Dan aka 1MACH2NV writing you from Wappingers Falls NY where the family &amp; I are waiting from Mega Storm Sandy <br />
to hit land. Yup got the genertor at the ready, plenty of water, milk &amp; bread. Oh yea plenty of reading material too - LOL.<br />
<br />
    I'm a mechanic / machinist by trade, but decided 20 some years ago - to go into antique, classic &amp; muscle car restoration.<br />
Second best thing I did in my life other then marrying my High School sweetie 40 years ago &amp; raising 5 children. <br />
<br />
    With the help of my youngest son Matthew, 1 own/operate a very modest 60x40 restoration shop called Dream Car Automotive/<br />
Restoration in Milton,NY <br />
<br />
    Also with the help of my son Matthew, we have compiled a modest collection of classics &amp; muscle cars. We enjoy car shows,<br />
cruise nights, drag racing, baseball/football, fishing/camping when time allows, close friends &amp; definitely family as we raised 5 children &amp; have 8 grandkids - LOL. <br />
<br />
    Our newest member to the collection is a Grabber Blue 71 Mustang 429CJ-RA Mach 1 w/4-speed &amp; A/C. I rescued the Mach from<br />
a chicken coop early last year in upstate NY where it had been sitting idle since 1980 with 33,000 miles. Two weeks ago my son &amp; I started what is to be a full blown OE restoration. <br />
<br />
                                                           Thank you for a chance to say hi &quot;HI&quot; &amp; have a very fine day.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>1MACH2NV</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Chat Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 21:59:17 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?7,61045,61045#msg-61045</guid>
            <title>A Couple Of Old Woodys (2 replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?7,61045,61045#msg-61045</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ A 1933 and a 1941.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>OldBloke</dc:creator>
            <category>Classic Ford</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 22:08:33 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61044,61044#msg-61044</guid>
            <title>Fords I Could Love (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61044,61044#msg-61044</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Pal of mine maintains a car collection up valley.  Occassionally calls on me to help exercise 'em.<br />
1st pic is a 41 woody with stroked Chevy 350 (sorry purists).  2nd pic is very well sorted Cobra 427 kit with genuine side oiler 427.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>OldBloke</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Chat Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:02:50 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?9,61043,61043#msg-61043</guid>
            <title>Can any tell me how many GT's are out there ???? (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?9,61043,61043#msg-61043</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hello every one,<br />
 <br />
I am new to the site but not the web.last fall I picked up a 1964 consul cortina GT from the 1st owner with 52k miles a few dent fromsitting ia barn for thepast 20+ years lots of dust and almost no rust thebody is very solid . Any way I worked on it most of the winter and now have it running but I still need to work a few bugs out  but she sure is zippy.what I would like to ask is this can any one tell me how many were shipped? From what I have found is it aint many. Any way I took it to the all ford show last weekend at the world HQ in Dearborn mi, and had a lot of &quot;what the heck is it?&quot; I love this car and it is a real head turner when ever I take it for a spin <br />
Any way thanks for looking]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Onyxdog</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford UK Market</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:15:56 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?4,61042,61042#msg-61042</guid>
            <title>Beating a dead horse [bronco] (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?4,61042,61042#msg-61042</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ firing up the ford [93 bronco]this summer i discovered that the AC was INOP . the low pressure switch on the system was functioning <br />
<br />
for my purpose needing AC for long haul <br />
<br />
i got this product to add..<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.es-refrigerants.com/products/w/id/480/t/r12-substitute-super-alternate-ac-recharge-kit/details.asp" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://www.es-refrigerants.com/products/w/id/480/t/r12-substitute-super-alternate-ac-recharge-kit/details.asp</a><br />
<br />
i was planning on pulling vacuum on the system , however when i got the gauge in i found i had positive pressure [ though low] in the system/.<br />
<br />
proper behavior would have been to go to a proper certified shop and had the r12 recovered . no proper shops around here . they would have just out gassed the r12. <br />
then done a proper recharge with r134 and all subsequent behavior most proper. however this is shade tree mechanics <br />
i care not to discuss the legality and advisability of my process. <br />
<br />
i added a can of oil .. with that addition of oil and +working+ fluid the low pressure switch engaged full AC compressor function . .. added a can of +stop leak+ a n 'O' ring sweller [ i can see oil and grim  accumulation at a particular place. its been that way for years and i been bitching to Ford Factory mechs <br />
<br />
added one can of the working fluid <br />
<br />
the supplied gauge was showing about 70 PSI on the low side .[way above the green] ''<br />
i considered .. measured temps all around in the engine compartment with my IR gun .. abt 195F <br />
<br />
measured out put temps on the AC .. showing in the 70's F..[ ambient was 95F ] <br />
<br />
upped engine RPM from idle to +road speed + 2500 rpm , observed that the low pressure reading on the AC fell to abt 45 PSI [ IN THE GREEN] . went in to cabin and held 2500 RPM and measured AC fell to the 60's .. <br />
<br />
how excellent i thought  ..wife came by and said &quot;whats that leaking' I GOT OUT TO OBSERVE ..<br />
<br />
catastrophic failure of the engine cooling system[radiator] <br />
see pics .. <br />
<br />
i think i was 4-5 feet back when the radiator failed ,, top hose waved in the air and spewed  hot coolant . i took some in the face .. went right away and put cold water on my face .. then aloevera .. you may or not know about aloe. its a gel .. and is healing and cools but is a bit slimy .. i went back out and my wife saw me with the slime aloe streaming off my face and thought it was all the skin o my face falling off  .. <br />
<br />
just like canning tomatoes i told her.. <br />
<br />
what a good joke.. heh.. not to say if you take live steam in the face all the skin wont slide off . in that case emergency evacuation is indicated .. <br />
<br />
i just put my face in a pan of ice water and drank half jug of vodka.. <br />
<br />
conclusion<br />
<br />
plastic radiators get weak in time . <br />
<br />
maybe any old ford operator be advised to drop the pressure on pressure rerlease cap a little . <br />
im just as happy the rad failed in the parking lot as in a big city stau .. or at 7K feet rock crawling in the outback <br />
<br />
though id just as soon not took the charge in my face.. i took some frags off that explosion too<br />
<br />
takes 2 bolts to pull the rad, 2 screws to pull the shroud .. plus the radiator hoses . such an easy excange one thinks it was +expected+]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mrbarry</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Trucks</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:31:01 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61040,61040#msg-61040</guid>
            <title>How does the Ford Ecoboost system work? (2 replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61040,61040#msg-61040</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I was asking myself this question and came across this great in-depth explanation over at <a href="http://jalopnik.com/5042696/going-in+depth-with-fords-twin+turbocharged-v6-ecoboost-engine" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >Jalopnik</a>:<br />
<br />
<i>Today we made our way over to Ford's Beech Daly Technical Center, a nondescript building along the Dearborn side roads which houses what is, for lack of a better term, Ford's engine skunk works. Capable of doing everything from rapid-prototyped vinyl intakes to turning out fully functioning engines, the tech center is where all Ford's engines go to get the bugs worked out. Our mission was to get to know the 3.5-liter Ford EcoBoost on a nuts-and-bolts level by putting one together ourselves.<br />
<br />
We met up with Patrick Hespen from SVT communications, who guided us through the rows of workbenches stacked high with engine parts from every imaginable engine product. Deep in the back was a set of parts which, when fully assembled, would form a production-intent twin-turbocharged, 340 HP, 340 lb-ft Ford EcoBoost engine. You know, the one they're touting as a V6 which delivers the power of a V8. The beauty of the EcoBoost system is that it takes relatively few changes to go from a standard 3.5-liter V6 to a fire-breathing, twin-turbo monster developing peak torque at 1500 RPM. What it all boils down to is the combination of direct injection and two turbos. Those two main updates drive the smaller, but smartly executed, changes around them. <br />
<br />
So, let's follow the fuel through the engine: The first difference the gas sees is the addition of a mechanically actuated, high-pressure fuel pump. The pump rides on top of the drivers' side cylinder bank and gets its motive power from a four-sided cam lobe, brilliantly added to the intake cam. The fuel then passes into a high-pressure (like 3000 PSI high) stainless-steel common fuel rail to which is mounted three injectors, one assembly per side. The injectors are mounted to the underside of the cylinder head and poke into the distal edge of the compression chamber. <br />
<br />
Since the system direct-injects fuel into the chamber, games can be played with the actual flow of the spray. For instance, on start up, when the engine is cold and the catalysts aren't functioning, the engine injects a half-shot of fuel into chamber on the downward stroke of the intake cycle, then, as the piston comes back for ignition, a second half-shot is fired at the piston head. Notice the shape of top of the piston (sans the CNC'd EcoBoost logo): The little trough is designed specifically to ramp that secondary spray at the spark plug — the result is a locally rich mixture good for ignition, but a globally lean mixture, great for making heat fast. <br />
<br />
As the spent fuel leaves the combustion chamber, it meets another innovative feature: a stainless steel, stamped and welded two-walled exhaust manifold. The manifold is much lighter than its cast counterparts, but more importantly, its insulative properties keep the exhaust hotter, transferring more energy directly to the turbo. Speaking of the turbo, surprisingly, when we get to the turbo we find nothing notably exciting. The impeller side of turbo itself is made of a high-nickel-content alloy good for an operating temperature up to 1750 degrees Fahrenheit. The compressor side, while rated up to 220,000 rpm maximum speed, isn't really all that different than the one found on every other turbo on the market. <br />
<br />
Since the gas is spent, we're going to hop onto the intake air side now. That air gets compressed by the two turbos we just met, and then joins in a common tube. That tube has an electronic boost controller which dumps excess pressure electronically, instead of the &quot;Fast and Furious&quot; approved vacuum-driven blow-off valve. The air then makes it's way into an air-to-air intercooler, and the cooled air heads off to an all-new intake manifold, optimized for compact packaging and easy assembly. An interesting feature is the integration of the coolant pipe which runs under the whole length of the intake; it attaches at the rear to the coolant line in the valley and locates the thermostat and outlet for the heater core out of the way. Anyway, that air gets directed straight into the cylinders by valves enhanced with Inconel alloy for greater strength. <br />
<br />
Because we're engine geeks, there are myriad little details and upgrades we could go on about, like the addition of piston head oil sprayers, used to keep the piston head cool by hitting the bottom side with oil, and how they're brilliantly integrated into the crankshaft bearing oil pocket. Or the million miles of durability testing the engine has already undergone. Or the crazy ability to retard the timing up to 20 degrees...but we won't. We're happy to sit back and let the pictures do the rest of the talking, eagerly awaiting the day we get to put that bonkers power curve to the test.</i>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Chat Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:13:10 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61039,61039#msg-61039</guid>
            <title>Member Map improved, Find Owners in Your Area (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61039,61039#msg-61039</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Just a quick note to let you know I've improved the Member Map area of the website, it now only shows members that either registered, or have signed in on this website, instead of ALL members across the entire AutoShrine.com family of auto websites.  Check it out, add your pin!<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.fordfirst.com/member/map.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://www.fordfirst.com/member/map.php</a><br />
<br />
(You may have to zoom out with the &quot;-&quot; button if there aren't any other owners in your area yet.  Click and drag the map to move)<br />
<br />
Skye]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Chat Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 18:50:24 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?7,61038,61038#msg-61038</guid>
            <title>1958 Ford Ranchero (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?7,61038,61038#msg-61038</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This old beauty has been around town since I drove up in mid 60s.  Original owner and his only daily driver.  The car was a trendsetting development and and destined to become a classic ride.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>OldBloke</dc:creator>
            <category>Classic Ford</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:33:35 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?10,61037,61037#msg-61037</guid>
            <title>1950 Ford Prefect $2000 [Los Angeles, CA] (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?10,61037,61037#msg-61037</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Not mine, just passing it along... see the link below for contact info<br />
<br />
<hr class="bbcode"/>
<br />
1950 English Ford Prefect four door, right hand drive, cool looking car. It has a 4-cylinder datsun engine and transmission. Gas Saver! Its been sitting in my back yard have no time for it. needs a battery and clean carb. Regestration is on non opp. Looks like a Anglia. Any question text or call me at 562-360-2325. Asking $2000 OBO Thanks Bert <br />
<br />
<a href="http://losangeles.craigslist.org/lgb/cto/3049983159.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://losangeles.craigslist.org/lgb/cto/3049983159.html</a><br />
<br />
<center class="bbcode"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/MXD2H.jpg" class="bbcode" border="0" /></center>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
            <category>Buy, Sell &amp; Trade Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 13:36:20 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?9,61036,61036#msg-61036</guid>
            <title>1951 Ford Prefect on BaT (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?9,61036,61036#msg-61036</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I am sooo tempted...!  My 2nd car ever bought!<br />
<br />
<a href="http://bringatrailer.com/2012/05/21/1951-ford-prefect-sedan/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://bringatrailer.com/2012/05/21/1951-ford-prefect-sedan/</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>OldBloke</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford UK Market</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:08:36 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?4,61035,61035#msg-61035</guid>
            <title>fuel gauge calibration (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?4,61035,61035#msg-61035</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi, all! I have a 68 Bronco, I want to know if there is any adjustment for the fuel gauge? <br />
When it is full it reads 3/4 of a tank, when it's about empty it reads way below E. Any ideas?<br />
<br />
 Thanks, Brian]]></description>
            <dc:creator>1jetmech</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Trucks</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 22:20:51 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?10,61034,61034#msg-61034</guid>
            <title>1953-1955 mercury steering wheel for sale [winston salem NC, USA] (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?10,61034,61034#msg-61034</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ 1953, 1954, 1955 Mercury steering wheel, very good condition, $100 plus mailing.  336-608-2954, Mocksville, N.C.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>jerrybev</dc:creator>
            <category>Buy, Sell &amp; Trade Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 23:33:09 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61030,61030#msg-61030</guid>
            <title>Hello,Hello! (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61030,61030#msg-61030</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hello everyone, <br />
As a newcomer, i am very glad to be here. i hope that someone have good news can share with me. <br />
Thank you!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>smalltiger</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Chat Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 21:48:15 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?7,61029,61029#msg-61029</guid>
            <title>Getting and maintaining a Late ‘40’s Ford? (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?7,61029,61029#msg-61029</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi All,<br />
<br />
As you can see I am not a Ford owner, but I am thinking about a late ‘40’s Ford.  For me, this would be a nostalgia thing.  My father owned what I believe was a 46–48 Ford Deluxe 4-Door.  <br />
<br />
How available are parts for this kind of vintage?  <br />
<br />
Remember this is new to me.  I am an MG owner, and third party parts are easy to get.<br />
<br />
Thanks]]></description>
            <dc:creator>TomTxState</dc:creator>
            <category>Classic Ford</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:02:53 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?7,61028,61028#msg-61028</guid>
            <title>New here.... (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?7,61028,61028#msg-61028</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ See some familiar names from some of the Skyesters other forums...one notably in Napa...<br />
<br />
Just saw this and thougt I'd post my blue oval interests.  Family's first car 1955 Ford Custom with 3 speed slush box...what I learned to drive and filched at times in the early morning hours with my pal up the street to learn to drive &quot;on my own&quot;....if Dad knew, it was the best kept secret ever and today I don't know I was really that smart...will never know for sure.<br />
<br />
1965 Mustang GT...my third car, bought at about age 19...should have taken better care of her.  1966 Mustang convertible...paid exactly $125 for a 100K mile car with bad front seal in the C4 trans...hoped to repair front end on the crashed GT but didn't figure some things correctly....money and time off the top.  Kept the old girl for 35 years and sold on Efee 2 years ago to Canada...$4000 and they had it running in 3 days...anothe testament to the worth blue oval.<br />
<br />
1968 Intermeccanica Omega...289 Ford powered Italian import.  One of only 40 made with links to Holman and Moody where the HP and std small blocks and running gear were dropped in.  Interesting story when GM came after the company for infringement on the name court ruled in favor the my maker, Holman and Moody saw the chance to bail AND recoup $$$, hired hand finished the last 10 or so.  I met in in Charlotte a few years back and he has the very last example in his stable.<br />
<br />
1969 Detomasso Mangusta 1 of about 400.  Predecessor of the Pantera with a 302 mid/rear engine and ZF trans axle.  My particular car was the subject of a magazine article about the owner of the company, entitled Alajandro's Spruce Goose.  Would like a copy but refuse to pay the $10 the issue demands on Efee or buying a years worth of the mag for $25 and pay shipping...maybe some day....but I refuse to be gouged for yard sale items in celebration of a car I personally own when there is real $ needed to maintain the car. <br />
<br />
Alajandro Detomasso was the South American race horse breeder who rotated into car building and whose biz was rescued when Lincoln Mercury dealers started offering the Pantera on their floor plan.  They reissued the Mangusta name sake a few years ago and it was a dismal disappointment.  AD died just a couple years ago and I believe the company is no more. <br />
<br />
Thus my current stock of &quot;Ford hybrids&quot; are all orphans but well housed.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>kirks-auto</dc:creator>
            <category>Classic Ford</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:20:29 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?9,61026,61026#msg-61026</guid>
            <title>Classic British Cars - One Lady Owner (Video) (2 replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?9,61026,61026#msg-61026</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Fun little documentary about the Morris Minor, Standard 8, Triumph Herald, Ford Anglia, Riley Elf in the era of the new compact &quot;family&quot; cars and the independence it gave to many women for the first time<br />
<br />
<br/><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xfuyV2wrDik" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed><br/><br />
<br />
<br/><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PhIvPJnPczA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed><br/><br />
<br />
<br/><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/g5VPXD8fEQM" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed><br/>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford UK Market</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:01:05 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61025,61025#msg-61025</guid>
            <title>Video: Ford EVOS Concept Car (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61025,61025#msg-61025</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ A surprisingly lovely design from Ford: Evos Concept showcases Ford’s first truly global design language and a new vision for customer-focused and intuitive technologies<br />
<br />
<br/><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ol6i48kKzlI" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed><br/><br />
<br />
The doors are pretty amazing:<br />
<br />
<br/><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/j79KgJbh9L8" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed><br/>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Chat Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 03:02:33 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?15,61024,61024#msg-61024</guid>
            <title>first SHO owner on this forum? (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?15,61024,61024#msg-61024</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Great job expanding Skye!  As you can see I've been a member for long enough to remember when it was just the MGB experience.  I currently own and drive a variety of Fords, MGs and Triumphs, but my daily winter driver for the past 8 years has been a Gen 1 90 SHO.  <br />
I know their are other British car guys out there running SHOs too, so hopefully someone else will start posting here.<br />
I'm a full time British car mechanic and own Her Majesty's Auto Service (soon to be relocated from Swansea, MA to Pawtucket, RI) and do all the work on my Taurus myself.  I'm not a Ford factory tech who's worked on these cars since they were new, but living with one for 45k+ miles has taught me some things about them.<br />
My SHO is Black on Black with sunroof and regular climate control.  It currently has over 195,000 miles on it and runs as strong as ever.<br />
The only mods I've done are a drop in K&amp;N filter and a rod shifter conversion (I put a Dynomax exhaust on it but it has since rotted away).  I had to do some things to it when I bought it in 2003 for $500 with 147K on it.  I replaced the clutch (it was actually a bad release bearing), subframe bushings, brakes all around with all lines, exhaust, 60k service, plugs and wires and stereo head unit (JBL speakers and amp were and are still kicking).  Now I'm on my 2nd exhaust and have done some other maintenance, but I still likely have less than 3 grand into over the time I've owned it. <br />
It'll cruise all day at 100 or get 27mpg at 70.  It may not be quick by today's standards but it still surprises plenty of people at the lights or the kids on the interstate in their hopped up econoboxes who pull alongside and slow down to see if I'm willing to try them.  When I drop to 3rd and floor it and powershift at 95 they're usually in my mirrors trying to figure out what just happened.<br />
I love my SHO and when it finally dissolves into the earth I will be looking for another Gen 1 from somewhere outside of the rust belt to replace it.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Sleipnir</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Taurus SHO</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 19:19:09 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?10,61023,61023#msg-61023</guid>
            <title>for sale:  1957 Ford hub caps, wheel covers, (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?10,61023,61023#msg-61023</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ set of four 1957  Ford hub caps, 14&quot; in very good condition  $75 plus mailing,  336-765-8312 or 336-749-5922, Winston Salem NC  email: <a href="mailto:&#119;&#119;&#104;&#105;&#116;&#102;&#105;&#101;&#108;&#100;&#64;&#116;&#114;&#105;&#97;&#100;&#46;&#114;&#114;&#46;&#99;&#111;&#109;">&#119;&#119;&#104;&#105;&#116;&#102;&#105;&#101;&#108;&#100;&#64;&#116;&#114;&#105;&#97;&#100;&#46;&#114;&#114;&#46;&#99;&#111;&#109;</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>jerrybev</dc:creator>
            <category>Buy, Sell &amp; Trade Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 05:54:39 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?4,61020,61020#msg-61020</guid>
            <title>1950 F-1 (2 replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?4,61020,61020#msg-61020</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Finally got a photo up. Bought it 22 years ago (had to go look), yanked the six out shortly thereafter, dropped a 239 in it. Then, decided to put a 255 in about 6 years ago. Grille was mangled upon arrival, finally found another, lovely bride stated she like blue, so For Blue it is. Counting the heater ducting, it was like 40 bolts holding it in, none of which had been out since 1950......lot of work, but it's in. Drive it often...gotta find time to drive all three.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Curmudgeon</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Trucks</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:19:31 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61018,61018#msg-61018</guid>
            <title>F-1! (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61018,61018#msg-61018</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I'll have to get a photo up. Had this 1950 for....26 or 27 years, still plugs along. Soon as the listing of vehicles shows &quot;F-1&quot; I'll list it.....'cause it sure ain't an F-100!<br />
I had pictures, but the last computer explosion took the latest unsaved entries out.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Curmudgeon</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Chat Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:43:57 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61009,61009#msg-61009</guid>
            <title>First Ford engined MGB GT V8 conversion (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,61009,61009#msg-61009</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I am researching the MGB GT V8 and was wondering if anyone can tell me (or at least point me in the direction of someone who can) when the first conversion of an MGB GT to Ford V8 engine was done. <br />
<br />
Ideally I would like to get some form of proof of it's construction (ideally as a series by a car conversion specialist or other). I need to prove that 2 MGB GTs were converted to Ford V8 engines and what type of engine (289, 302, 351...) before 12.31.1988.<br />
<br />
Cheers<br />
<br />
drew]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Chilipadi</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Chat Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 05:20:25 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?7,61007,61007#msg-61007</guid>
            <title>Thunder Road (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?7,61007,61007#msg-61007</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Remember this cult movie featuring now classic &quot;hot&quot; Fords?<br />
<br />
<br/><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tdwUpxkfSJw" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed><br/>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>OldBloke</dc:creator>
            <category>Classic Ford</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:22:48 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?7,61003,61003#msg-61003</guid>
            <title>Classic or...? (4 replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?7,61003,61003#msg-61003</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Rumbles around my 'hood.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>OldBloke</dc:creator>
            <category>Classic Ford</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 06:59:58 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?6,61000,61000#msg-61000</guid>
            <title>Ford Phaeton V8 (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?6,61000,61000#msg-61000</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This is in a collection maintained by a pal of mine.  Like the one a famous gangster (don't remember which) sent a thank you note to Henry Ford for making such a fast getaway car.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>OldBloke</dc:creator>
            <category>Pre-War Ford</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 14:36:59 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?3,60999,60999#msg-60999</guid>
            <title>Hill Climbin'/Dirt Trackin' Cortina (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?3,60999,60999#msg-60999</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Back in the day when the world was younger and so was I...!  Lotta fun with this bullet proof old beastie.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>OldBloke</dc:creator>
            <category>Motorsport</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 11:34:30 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?9,60998,60998#msg-60998</guid>
            <title>My 1st Ford (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?9,60998,60998#msg-60998</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Once I got it started was pretty reliable old ride.  '50 or '51 Prefect?...Perfect?  Can't recall.  Anybody know?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>OldBloke</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford UK Market</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 14:45:25 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?17,60997,60997#msg-60997</guid>
            <title>Video: How It Works: The All-Electric Focus (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?17,60997,60997#msg-60997</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <i>&quot;The Focus Electric runs exclusively on electricity stored in powerful, state-of-the-art batteries, which means it never needs a drop of gas.<br />
- Powered by a 23 kwh high-voltage, lightweight lithium-ion battery system.<br />
- Regenerative Braking captures energy during braking and recycles it to recharge the battery. <br />
- Charges with the available 240-volt charging station or standard 120-volt convenience cord&quot;</i><br />
<br />
<br/><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jT1nYHqN4C0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed><br/>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Electric</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 17:48:48 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?8,60995,60995#msg-60995</guid>
            <title>2012 Ford Focus- Active Grille Shutter (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?8,60995,60995#msg-60995</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Pretty cool feature for a road car...<br />
<br />
<br/><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Sx66DYQbd4o" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed><br/>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
            <category>Modern Ford</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:11:56 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?10,60994,60994#msg-60994</guid>
            <title>1940 ford truck title (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?10,60994,60994#msg-60994</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ 1940 ford truck title for sale $50 for the auto literature, auto paper collector, for memorabilia purposes only.<br />
336-765-8312, <a href="mailto:&#119;&#119;&#104;&#105;&#116;&#102;&#105;&#101;&#108;&#100;&#64;&#116;&#114;&#105;&#97;&#100;&#46;&#114;&#114;&#46;&#99;&#111;&#109;">&#119;&#119;&#104;&#105;&#116;&#102;&#105;&#101;&#108;&#100;&#64;&#116;&#114;&#105;&#97;&#100;&#46;&#114;&#114;&#46;&#99;&#111;&#109;</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>jerrybev</dc:creator>
            <category>Buy, Sell &amp; Trade Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 16:29:07 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?1,60993,60993#msg-60993</guid>
            <title>Ford Cars For Sale - Free Classifieds (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?1,60993,60993#msg-60993</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <span style="font-size:large"><b>Free Classifieds</b></span><br />
<br />
Want to buy or sell a Ford Mustang, Thunderbird, Truck or any other model?<br />
<br />
This website now has FREE Ford Cars For Sale classifieds:  <br />
<br />
<span style="font-size:large"><a href="http://www.fordfirst.com/registry/forsale.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >Ford Cars For Sale</a></span><br />
<br />
All classified listings are automatically published to the Oodle Network and over 250 partner sites including CarDomain, Cox Interactive, Media General, The Washington Post, San Diego Union Tribune, Military.com and Lycos for free!  It's a great to sell your car.<br />
<br />
<b>How to list your car for sale:</b> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.fordfirst.com/registry/entry.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >Create a registry entry for it</a>, click the &quot;This vehicle is For Sale&quot; checkbox and add a price.  Remember that listings with a price and photos sell a lot faster.<br />
<br />
<b>Want to buy or sell used car parts?</b><br />
<br />
Check out the <a href="http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/list.php?10" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >Trader Forum</a>.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
            <category>Announcements</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:28:17 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?10,60992,60992#msg-60992</guid>
            <title>1968 California special (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?10,60992,60992#msg-60992</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ A good friend of mine who is ill at this time has asked if I could sell his mustang . It has been sitting for some time looks to be a very clean car.Supposedly this car was raced by Parnely Jones at LagonaSeca in1968 in a showroom stock car race.  looking for some input as to worth Thanks raymud@aol.com(707)537-8635  Ray]]></description>
            <dc:creator>raymud</dc:creator>
            <category>Buy, Sell &amp; Trade Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 14:25:20 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,60989,60989#msg-60989</guid>
            <title>New Library Article: EEC IV Truck Codes (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,60989,60989#msg-60989</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ New Library Article: <br />
<br />
<span style="font-size:large"><a href="http://www.fordfirst.com/article/eec-iv-truck-codes.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >EEC IV Truck Codes  </a></span>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Chat Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:52:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,60988,60988#msg-60988</guid>
            <title>Finding parts for the car Ford swears they didn't build. (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,60988,60988#msg-60988</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ The 93 to 97 Ford Probe GT 5-Speed is one great automobile. They are however and always have been expensive to maintain.  This is complicated by the fact that the change to OBD-2 diagnostic ports in 1996 eliminated easy diagnostics of things like Oxygen Sensors or any programmable tuning so far as I've discovered.<br />
<br />
My 95 GT is my second. I had a dark blue 94 GT for six years. Wrecked it.  Swore I'd never get such a high maintenance POS again. Every repair, went the six-year running-joke, was $1,200. Went through a couple of beater Hyundias (lots of fun actually until they became terminally ill) And my wife said, &quot;I want another Probe.  We finally settled on this one.<br />
<br />
Thank God all of the replacement stuff these things need are available now from the usual autoparts houses (Autozone seems to be the best)at prices that are eminently more affordable than when I was driving the 94 (Ya gotta go to da dealer for dat, its $1,200.)<br />
<br />
The down side is that Ford also stocks no parts for the cars or even admits the Probe has a Ford Logo on it. Everyone sez go to Mazda (626 V6)<br />
But I've had even less luck with them.<br />
<br />
Now here is the big problem, Anything made of plastic on the exterior of the car has become brittle with age.  My wife ran it through a brushless pressure washer car wash and blew the drivers door bottom to bits.  I cannot find any replacements.<br />
<br />
Does anybody know a source for all things Probe?   I have technical questions as well and found the MGE forum a diamond mine of information from knowledgable members and a source for all those things my MGB-GT needs.<br />
<br />
<br />
Dave]]></description>
            <dc:creator>favedave</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Chat Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:23:12 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?8,60985,60985#msg-60985</guid>
            <title>1999 Escort Engine TOAST!! (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?8,60985,60985#msg-60985</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I have been tearing apart my sister in law's engine to see what happened. Looks like the cylinder wall failed in two places. The piston is all chewed up, broke apart at the connecting rod pin, bent the connecting rod...TOAST! I imagine that the machine shop prefers that the cylinder walls are intact to try and sleave it.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Sphartin</dc:creator>
            <category>Modern Ford</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:12:45 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,60984,60984#msg-60984</guid>
            <title>New Library Article: Car Batteries 101 (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,60984,60984#msg-60984</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ New Library Article:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size:large"><a href="http://www.fordfirst.com/article/batteries-101.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >Car Batteries 101</a></span>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Chat Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:21:44 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?4,60983,60983#msg-60983</guid>
            <title>F350 suspension clanking (4 replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?4,60983,60983#msg-60983</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I have a 1995 F350 diesel crew cab dually 2 wheel drive, that lately has had a clanking under drivers side on suspension movements, braking, and turning. I replaced the shocks last year, still there afterwards. The noise is getting worse and I can feel it through the floorboards under my feet. I have checked tightness of bolts, nuts, shock mounts, etc.. Any idea what this is? I even had a shop take a look and they said they could not find anything loose. Thanks, Lloyd]]></description>
            <dc:creator>lhess</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Trucks</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 02:56:02 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?8,60982,60982#msg-60982</guid>
            <title>replacing plugs on Taurus DOHC (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?8,60982,60982#msg-60982</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ The sidewinder engine makes it awkward to get at the back 3 plugs (numbered 1-2-3, by the way, front of engine -- right/passenger side -- to the rear).<br />
<br />
Here's the procedure for the very similar Escape, grabbed from another ford forum.<br />
<br />
Replacing the spark plugs on a V-6 Escape isn't a really difficult job but it can be time consuming. Allow 2-4 hours depending on your skill level. The upper intake manifold must be removed to get to the rear plugs.<br />
<br />
You will need 6 spark plugs (Motorcraft only) and 6 upper intake manifold gaskets.<br />
<br />
1. Remove the plastic engine appearance cover over the top of the engine. It has 3, 8mm nuts that attach it to the valve cover studs.<br />
<br />
2. Loosen the hose clamps that hold the intake tube to the throttle body and air filter housing. Pull the breather hose out of the intake tube and remove the tube.<br />
<br />
3. Remove the throttle cable from the bracket by twisting the cable housing and then remove the cable from the throttle lever on the throttle body.<br />
<br />
4. Remove the cruise control cable from the stud on the throttle lever by pulling it up. Don't try prying it off or it will break. Squeeze the tabs that hold the cruise control cable housing into the bracket and remove the cable from the bracket.<br />
<br />
5. Remove the cable bracket from the upper intake manifold and tie the cables out of the way, probably to the cruise control servo.<br />
<br />
6. Disconnect the TP (Throttle Position) sensor and IAC (Idle Air Control). Un-clip the vent hose from the bracket under the throttle body.<br />
<br />
7. Remove the vacuum hose and vapor hose from the Vapor Management Valve. The vapor hose has 2 tabs that you carefully pry apart to remove it.<br />
<br />
8. Remove the vacuum hose from the EGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation) valve and the 2 hoses from the EGR solenoid as well as the connector on the solenoid. The connector has a tab you squeeze to release it.<br />
<br />
9. Remove the EGR tube from the valve. It takes a 1 1/8&quot; wrench.<br />
<br />
10. Remove the vacuum hoses from the back of the intake manifold.<br />
<br />
11. Un-clip the electrical connectors from the manifold. You don't have to disconnect the connectors.<br />
<br />
12. Remove the nut that holds the wiring bracket to the EGR solenoid and position the wiring out of the way.<br />
<br />
13. Tie the wiring and hoses out of the way.<br />
<br />
14. Remove the 8 bolts that hold the upper intake manifold to the lower manifolds.<br />
<br />
15. Stuff clean rags in the intake ports so nothing accidentally falls into them.<br />
<br />
16. Unplug the connectors off the COPs (Coil On Plug). Each cylinder has it's own coil.<br />
<br />
17. Remove the bolts and COPs.<br />
<br />
18. It's a good idea to clean the rubber boot part of each COP. I like to clean them with WD40.<br />
<br />
19. Blow out the spark plug wells with compressed air and remove the spark plugs.<br />
<br />
20. Check the new spark plugs with a gaping tool to .052-.056&quot;. Do not adjust them, take them back for another plug. It is not advisable to gap platinum plugs. Damage can occur.<br />
<br />
21. Install the new spark plugs. Use a small amount of anti-seize on the threads.<br />
<br />
22. A good way to thread the new spark plugs into their holes is with a piece of rubber fuel line hose over the spark plug insulator. That way you can feel the threads starting and you'll be able to tell if they aren't screwing in easily. If they won't screw in using your fingers and a piece of hose, stop and see why not. Cross-threading spark plugs is no fun. Torque the spark plugs to 11 ft lbs or 132 lb in, use an Inch Pound torque wrench <br />
<br />
23. also recommended replacing the COP boots and springs. It's short money and there is less risk of arcing. Lastly while it's all apart take a look at the PCV hose and replace if necessary. It's much easier to replace when your in this deep<br />
<br />
24. Replace the intake manifold gaskets. They pop out with a small screwdriver or pick. Push the new ones into place.<br />
<br />
25. Reinstall the manifold carefully. You need to set it pretty much straight down onto the lower manifolds to make sure that you don't damage the gaskets. Torque the manifold bolts to 89 in.lbs or 7.5 ft.lbs. Do not over tighten.<br />
<br />
26. Use dielectric grease in the end of the rubber spark plug boots before the coils are assembled.<br />
<br />
27. Reassemble the rest in the opposite order that you took it apart.<br />
<br />
28. Try working the throttle a few times to make sure it returns properly etc.<br />
<br />
29. Start the engine and listen for any unusual noises such as vacuum leaks.<br />
<br />
30. Once you're all done you can congratulate yourself on a job well done and think about the $2-300 you just saved!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mac townsend</dc:creator>
            <category>Modern Ford</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:03:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,60981,60981#msg-60981</guid>
            <title>New Library Article: Battery Storage, Fact or Fiction? (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,60981,60981#msg-60981</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <span style="font-size:medium">New Library Article: Battery Storage, Fact or Fiction? <br />
<a href="http://www.fordfirst.com/article/storing-battery-on-concrete.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://www.fordfirst.com/article/storing-battery-on-concrete.html</a></span>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Chat Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 15:04:38 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,60979,60979#msg-60979</guid>
            <title>CEO of Ford, Alan Mullaly (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,60979,60979#msg-60979</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Back in May I had the opportunity to hear Alan Mullaly as a keynote speaker at the ASQ World conference in St. Louis and I have to say I was greatly impressed. Most keynote speakers including CEO's and Founders of other companies had fairly canned presentations, one so practiced (but very interesting) that I wondered just how many times he had given it. On the other hand, Mr. Mullaly talked a little about an article that was in the July 2009 issue of Foutune magazine but then opened the forum to field questions from the audience for about 45 minutes. I am a experienced quality engineer with a degree in business and working on an MBA and I have to admit I was impressed by his answers. It is because of how Ford handled the downturn and of Mr. Mullaly that I am proud to be a Ford fan.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Sphartin</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Chat Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 15:04:06 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,60976,60976#msg-60976</guid>
            <title>New Library Article: Mustangs List FAQ (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,60976,60976#msg-60976</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ New Library Article posted: <br />
<br />
<span style="font-size:large"><a href="http://www.fordfirst.com/article/mustangs-faq.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >Mustangs List FAQ</a></span>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Chat Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 16:52:37 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?7,60974,60974#msg-60974</guid>
            <title>oil  pressure drops off at 65mph-fresh rebuild (2 replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?7,60974,60974#msg-60974</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ had the oil pressure gauge drop to low at 65 mph but no noise or loss of power.any ideas?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>SLICK1967</dc:creator>
            <category>Classic Ford</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:36:49 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?4,60973,60973#msg-60973</guid>
            <title>howdy (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?4,60973,60973#msg-60973</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ 1993 Inline 6 300 CID 5 speed manual ,limited slip front and rear , extended range fuel tanks[ 50 gallons on-board] .. 170,000 miles or so on the odo. been through 2 transfer cases ,one  transmission and an alternator , but the engine does not use any oil at all, i can run it for a year with Mobil 1 and never add a quart ,<br />
this old thing has been up the creek and over the mountain more than once]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mrbarry</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Trucks</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 09:23:48 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,60971,60971#msg-60971</guid>
            <title>New Library Article: Frequently Used EEC-IV Abbreviations (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?2,60971,60971#msg-60971</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ New Library Article posted:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size:large"><a href="http://www.fordfirst.com/article/eec-iv-abbreviations.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >Frequently Used EEC-IV Abbreviations</a></span>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
            <category>Ford Chat Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:39:09 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60968,60968#msg-60968</guid>
            <title>Wanted: Rear Disk Brakes (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60968,60968#msg-60968</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: Dan Howley/HQ/3Com &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
With announced demise of the mustangs list I'm resending this <br />
message over here.  Apologies to those that have seen it before.<br />
<br />
With some of you more hard-core trackies getting the new Cobra <br />
brake upgrade, somebody should have a set of rear disk brakes left <br />
over.  Well I'd be happy to buy them and take them off your hands.  <br />
Am looking for all the parts that go on the back of the car, like <br />
disks, calipers w/ E-brakes, E-brake cables, brackets, and any <br />
flexlines you may have.  Don't need the master cylinder or the <br />
automatic E-brake adjuster defeater, and don't care about the pad <br />
condition.  Want to use my original 15 inch telephone dial wheels <br />
along with the stock axles so the kit must be of the 4-lug variety.  <br />
<br />
Thinking someone must be punting their old SSB or Motorsports <br />
package in favor of the Cobra stuff, and the last thing you want is a <br />
cluttered garage.  Let me help you clean it out and keep the peace <br />
with your SO.  If you live in the South SF Bay Area I might even be <br />
able to help you wrench when you go to install your kit.  Contact <br />
me by private email and I'm sure we can work something out.  Feel <br />
free to pass this request on to anyone else who may have a set to <br />
sell and isn't on the list. Thanks!<br />
<br />
(email redacted)           85GT            Santa Clara, Ca.<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 14:24:03 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60964,60964#msg-60964</guid>
            <title>'95 Ranger problem (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60964,60964#msg-60964</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: (email redacted) (Robert King)</b><br />
<br />
   Well my fiancee' is the proud owner of a brand-new '95 Ranger (dark blue<br />
with a saddle interior.)  Everything seems OK except for a strance cooling<br />
problem that cropped up this afternoon.<br />
<br />
   The truck seems to run normally and does not exhibit any signs of<br />
overheating, but after a few minutes of idling (after starting the engine<br />
cold,) the coolant temp guage as about at mid-sweep, then it ROCKETS all<br />
the way to top of the scale!  (By &quot;rockets&quot; I mean it moves from mid-scale<br />
to fully pegged in about 1.5 seconds.)  I *suspect* it is a wierded-out<br />
sending unit or a bad connection.  I've pretty much eliminated everything<br />
else I can think of:<br />
<br />
   - Coolant level checks out.  Even my fiancee' knew to check this, but it<br />
     COULD have been underfilled at the factory.<br />
<br />
   - Water pump seems OK.  No leaks are visible, and its not venting steam.<br />
     With the engine off, I let the truck sit with the heater on.  After the<br />
     water in the heater core had cooled off, the engine was started and hot<br />
     air almost immediately came out.<br />
<br />
   - Thermostat looks good too.  Early on I suspected this because with the<br />
     needle pegged, the air coming from the back of the radiator was<br />
     stone-cold, as were both tanks (that radiator's TINY!)  Aster a minute<br />
     or two of idling though, the air being sucked through it felt hot, as<br />
     did the tanks.<br />
<br />
   - I SUPPOSE a great big glob of sand could have been left over in the<br />
     casting process and worked its way somewhere important, but how likely<br />
     is this?  This is a WAG for me (WAG = Wild-Assed Guess.)<br />
<br />
   I'd really like your opinions.  The truck's going to the dealership<br />
tomorrow via Ford's roadside assistance program, but I'd like to have<br />
a better idea of the situation (forewarned is forearmed!)<br />
<br />
Thanks!<br />
Robert King<br />
<br />
<br />
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+<br />
| Robert A. King                |                                       |<br />
| Systems Software Engineer     |        &quot;Dulce et decorum est en       |<br />
| Kodak Health Imaging Systems  |        medio coitu mori&quot;              |<br />
| (email redacted)            |                 -- Nelson Rockefeller |<br />
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+<br />
| The opinions expressed here ain't even mine, much less my employer's! |<br />
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 23:39:27 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60961,60961#msg-60961</guid>
            <title>Anyone looking for EFI stuff... (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60961,60961#msg-60961</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: (email redacted)</b><br />
<br />
<br />
       I saw a message in the &quot;(email redacted)&quot; list from<br />
       a guy who found some FORD EFI parts in his shed that he was letting<br />
       a renter use...  Apparantly, the renter skated town and left the<br />
       parts.  The poster wanted to sell the stuff to get back some back<br />
       rent...  If I remember right, I think he said he saw &quot;Cobra&quot; on the<br />
       manifold, or maybe it was &quot;GT-40&quot;...  Anyway, anyone interested<br />
       could send a message to the address above asking for info...<br />
<br />
       Also, I have a 302 EFI Bronco motor and all it's components for<br />
       sale, along with an AOD 4speed tranny, 8.8&quot; axle and other parts.<br />
       I'd like to sell them to help finance my 460 EFI Swap...<br />
       SMD<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 17:14:13 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60960,60960#msg-60960</guid>
            <title>Early '64 VIN (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60960,60960#msg-60960</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: &quot;Timothy N. Taylor&quot; &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
<br />
	I don't have a VIN code book at my disposal and I would like to<br />
identify how far back they used sequential numbers in the VIN codes. <br />
Specifically a '64 with the last six numbers 100975 (ie. is it #975) and<br />
an offhand guess at it's value.  It's a A code 289 4bbl with a stock 4<br />
speed and Rally Pack.  Also what carburator should it have?  No I don't<br />
own it but I wish I did.  Thank you to anyone who can shed light on this.<br />
<br />
Tim Taylor  (email redacted)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 1995 00:53:41 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60958,60958#msg-60958</guid>
            <title>ADMIN: Fordnatics list moving for real! (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60958,60958#msg-60958</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: Chuck Fry &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
Thanks to all the guinea pigs for their help in shaking down the new<br />
Fordnatics list.  There have been a couple of glitches but nothing major<br />
has gone wrong.  So I'm going to finish the job shortly.<br />
<br />
I will move the digest subscribers first.  When that is complete,<br />
subscribers to the regular list will be moved.  This should happen<br />
without any action required on your part.<br />
<br />
There may be a brief period in which you get multiple copies of<br />
messages.  This is unavoidable.  With any luck it will also be brief.<br />
<br />
I'll have another announcement when the move has been completed with the<br />
new posting and request addresses.  Until then, continue to post to:<br />
 (email redacted)<br />
<br />
If you wish to report an urgent problem during this transition, mail to<br />
me at (email redacted).<br />
<br />
Wish me luck...<br />
 -- Chuck Fry, Fordnatics list moving man<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 16:30:44 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60956,60956#msg-60956</guid>
            <title>upolstry q (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60956,60956#msg-60956</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: TRBOBRD &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
<br />
	Is there a paint or dye that I could use to bring my faded cloth <br />
seats back to life. The top of the rear seat is blue (was charcoal <br />
black), and the sides of the front seatbacks are starting to do the same <br />
thing. <br />
<br />
I think its time to tint the windows!!  On that note, does anyone know of <br />
a tinting kit to do the rear window without bubbles and lines?<br />
thx.<br />
******************************************************************************<br />
                              =--&gt;GoocH&lt;--=<br />
                          '88 T-bird T forTURBO!<br />
           *Alpine*Rockford Fosgate*Coustic*Sony*Audiovox*Jensen*<br />
                             '93 Trek 9000 <br />
      			    1967 Datsun 2000 <br />
(email redacted)                                       Bryan Berndt<br />
*****************************************************************************<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 22:28:25 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60955,60955#msg-60955</guid>
            <title>The end of an era: Mustangs list closes down (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60955,60955#msg-60955</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: Chuck Fry &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
As anticipated, Gary Gitzen has announced the Mustangs list will be shut<br />
down later this week.  Say what you will about Gary's moderating style,<br />
but he did provide a remarkably well-mannered forum where people could<br />
swap questions, answers, race reports, and tall tales about their late<br />
model Mustangs.<br />
<br />
I made many friends and learned more than I should admit from the<br />
Mustangs list.  And of course Gary's work provided the inspiration for<br />
the Fordnatics list.<br />
<br />
This is truly the end of an era on the 'Net.  Thanks for the good times,<br />
Gary.  I'll miss your list.<br />
 -- Chuck<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 16:21:49 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60954,60954#msg-60954</guid>
            <title>C-4 behind 2.3L turbo (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60954,60954#msg-60954</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: (email redacted)</b><br />
<br />
I need to know what it takes to put a C-4 behind a Ford 2.3L turbo engine.<br />
 Can it be done with stock parts?  What about flex plate, bellhousing,<br />
converter?<br />
<br />
Thanks.<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 17:47:43 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60951,60951#msg-60951</guid>
            <title>All this B.S. (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60951,60951#msg-60951</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: HANNA JONATHAN DAVID &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Personally I think you guys have generated twice the amount of junk mail <br />
by bitching about this subscribe/unsubscribe thing than I have seen in <br />
the year or so I've been listening to this list.  Chuck does a great job <br />
and I understand his frustration, but the rest of you guys are creating <br />
more of a pain by babbling about it.<br />
	I'm more fed up listening to all of you who &quot;follow the rules&quot; <br />
than anything alse so I'm unsubscribing myself.  (and yes I sent the <br />
appropriate message to the appropriate adress.)<br />
<br />
Jonathan Hanna<br />
(email redacted)<br />
<br />
67 Cougar XR-7 GT 390<br />
67 Cougar GT 390<br />
69 Cougar 351<br />
68 Mustang 200<br />
66 Mustang 289<br />
68 Mustang High Country Special<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 21:03:27 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60949,60949#msg-60949</guid>
            <title>try again! (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60949,60949#msg-60949</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: (email redacted)</b><br />
<br />
From:	SHV1::TREDWARB     25-MAY-1995 14:12:27.22<br />
To:	ESDS01::&quot;(email redacted)&quot;<br />
CC:	TREDWARB<br />
Subj:	0-100-0 times<br />
<br />
At 1250 lbs, 800+hp and big tires, the F1 gets my vote as best candidate for<br />
the 0-100-0 wars.<br />
<br />
The only other possible contender was that 65 Impala with the JATO bottle <br />
and the cliff!!<br />
<br />
Ron Tredway<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 16:15:49 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60948,60948#msg-60948</guid>
            <title>Reputable dealer recommendation needed (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60948,60948#msg-60948</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: &quot;CarloJP&quot; &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
     Does anyone have a recommendation for a dealer with a good service rep <br />
     in or near upper Fairfield county in Connecticut?<br />
     <br />
     I have an 88 Taurus LX with the 3.8L engine.  I had a new Ford <br />
     compressor installed last summer and it's still under warrantee.  The <br />
     compressor is leaking and won't hold a charge.  All the seals in the <br />
     AC lines have been replaced with the _good_ o-rings.  It needs either <br />
     a new AC compressor, or new compressor seals.  How much should this <br />
     kind of work cost?  The location of the compressor makes the job <br />
     difficult.<br />
     <br />
     Any advice is appreciated.<br />
     <br />
     Jim<br />
     <br />
     <br />
     BTW, how much do you think I could get for this monster?<br />
     approx 75K miles, 3.8L, ps, pb, power windows, locks &amp; sunroof, <br />
     digital dash, keyless entry, AC, heated windsheild, gray leather <br />
     interior, split bench power seats w/lumbar support, alloy rims, almost <br />
     new all-season radials, gray metallic two tone paint with no rust, <br />
     very clean inside and out.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 1995 00:24:36 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60945,60945#msg-60945</guid>
            <title>Tranny swap? (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60945,60945#msg-60945</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: Tom Stangler	&lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
Tom Reynolds stroked the keyboard.....<br />
=         At the risk of sounding completely stupid (but<br />
= at least not trying to unsubscribe here! :) what is involved in trying<br />
= to put a 5 speed in? (I am totally trans-clueless)<br />
<br />
lets see if I can take a stab at some of the parts required...<br />
<br />
 -T-5 transmission<br />
	shifter, shifter boot, <br />
 -clutch assembly<br />
	clutch, disk, pressureplate, clutch fork<br />
 -flywheel<br />
 -clutch pedal assembly<br />
	quadrant, paul, cable, under dash braketry<br />
 -driveshaft<br />
 -computer<br />
 -speedo cable?<br />
	vss sensor?<br />
<br />
anyone else add/delete to this list?<br />
- -- <br />
***************************************************************************<br />
Tom Stangler        | 86 Mustang GT, C Prepared         the Thunder class <br />
QC Mngr, TRACOR     | -----------------------------------------------------<br />
Va Beach, VA        | Tidewater Sports Car Club, LTD    (email redacted)<br />
(email redacted)    | &quot;The RAT Weekend&quot; Autox         June 03/04 @ Fentress<br />
<br />
<br />
                    <br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 19:57:05 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60934,60934#msg-60934</guid>
            <title>Tracer suspension questions (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60934,60934#msg-60934</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: Jim Heaton &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
I've gotten such valuable and knowledgable information here in the<br />
past I'm going to post another question.<br />
<br />
My '91 Tracer LTS has 50K miles.  I drive it dialy on a moderately<br />
bumpy dirt road.  Just tha last few days it seems that when my right<br />
front tire hits a bump much more vibration is transmitted throughout<br />
the vehicle.  Driveability is fine except tracking around bumpy corners<br />
is poor.<br />
<br />
My amateur diagnosis is that I've blown a seal on the front passenger<br />
strut.  How can I verify this (the &quot;bounce&quot; test I used on my shock<br />
equipped vehicles).  If the struts do need replacement should I change<br />
just the front 2 or all 4?<br />
<br />
I'd love to slowly upgrade the vehicle to a bit better than factory<br />
performance.  Adding COMP T/A's added a huge performance differential<br />
in terms of acceleration (hook up and radial).  If I'm replacing<br />
struts can I just do the cartridges?  It there something that will be<br />
better than the factory units without giving me a harsh ride?<br />
<br />
Thanks for any ideas.<br />
 -Jim<br />
<br />
*****************************************************************<br />
This is a test of the emergency .sig system.  This is only a test.<br />
<br />
Jim Heaton           (email redacted)            AA8RF<br />
*****************************************************************<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 10:11:54 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60933,60933#msg-60933</guid>
            <title>0-100-0 (WasCapri Info Revisit (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60933,60933#msg-60933</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: (email redacted) (Walt Boeninger)</b><br />
<br />
[from &quot;Brian St. Denis&quot;]<br />
<i>&gt;&gt; Hell, I</i><br />
<i>&gt;&gt; bet and indy car or F1 car could do 0-100-0 in 10 seconds or less.</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
  <br />
Before this gets too carried away:<br />
  <br />
1) The qualifier of PRODUCTION car is a key item.<br />
2) The 427 Cobra 0-100-0 time was under 14 seconds, not 10.<br />
  <br />
So what production cars have been able to beat the Cobra?  Perhaps<br />
a Diablo, or F-40...I don't recall...<br />
  <br />
- -----<br />
Regards<br />
  <br />
  Walt Boeninger            Phone:  (415) 691-3394 (800) 477-6222<br />
  Hewlett Packard Company   E-Mail: (email redacted)<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 15:25:06 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60932,60932#msg-60932</guid>
            <title>Intermittent brake problem (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60932,60932#msg-60932</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: (email redacted) (D ROBERTSON)</b><br />
<br />
Dear Fordnatics:<br />
    I have a 86 Crown Vic (non-police) with ~70k miles .Every few months <br />
the brake pedal will not go down when pressed (this makes for an <br />
exciting few seconds w/ the family in the car). You have to really stomp <br />
your foot down to get them to work. You can hear a pang noise from the <br />
rear then they work fine for a few more months. I have replaced the <br />
shoes , springs  &amp; adjusters. I have also checked the vacuum booster, <br />
master cylinder and wheel cylinders, these check okay. I looked under <br />
the dash to check for interference with the pedal linkage but did not <br />
see any thing obvious. The vehicle is 100% stock (except for the kid's <br />
car seats).<br />
   Any suggestions would be welcome ,I do not want to resort to <br />
swaptology to find the problem. Thanks<br />
                        Sincerely;<br />
                          Dave Robertson<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 17:08:35 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60931,60931#msg-60931</guid>
            <title>2-door wagons and a trivia question (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60931,60931#msg-60931</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: (email redacted) (Marty Merritt)</b><br />
<br />
Someone was wondering if there was a two-door Ford wagon in the late<br />
sixties and early seventies.  Tad Burness shows only four-doors for the<br />
Ford (LTD), Falcon, Fairlane, and Torino lines during that period in his<br />
*American Car Spotter's Guide 1966-1980*.  The &quot;Country Squire&quot; or &quot;Squire&quot;<br />
was the woodgrain model, other, plainer models were the &quot;Ranch Wagon&quot; or<br />
&quot;Country Sedan.&quot;  I also looked at the Ranchero entries to see if there was<br />
a panel delivery model, but saw no mention of one.<br />
<br />
Here's the trivia question for all you Fordnatics:<br />
<br />
What do the Mercury Villager, Ford Ranger, AMC Pacer, and Chevrolet<br />
Citation have in common?  Hint:  The Ford Corsair (a European model)<br />
belongs in this group, too.<br />
<br />
<br />
Marty Merritt<br />
Facilities Coordinator, The Shepherd School of Music<br />
Rice University<br />
Houston, Texas<br />
(email redacted)<br />
 ___________________________________________________________________<br />
<br />
 *  Never trust the obvious.<br />
<br />
 *  Always sleep and eat whenever you get the chance; you never know<br />
    when your next chance may be.<br />
___________________________________________________________________<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 16:49:52 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60930,60930#msg-60930</guid>
            <title>Turbo/Engine for GT40 replica (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60930,60930#msg-60930</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: (email redacted) (Clive Doubell)</b><br />
<br />
Hi again<br />
<br />
I,m posting this one for me.<br />
<br />
For the past n years I have been in the process of building up a Ford GT40 <br />
replica - with some luck it could be finished this year. Originally I <br />
earmarked a 351C4V for the car, even up to the point where it was actually <br />
fitted, coupled to an Audi (rearmounted) manual 5 sp box. However when my <br />
3.0 l Ford Courier PU (probably similar to Mazda PU in the USA) blew its <br />
box, I shoved the 351 in. This leaves the GT40 engineless. I would like to <br />
hear some opinions/advice/suggestions/thoughts on the following:<br />
<br />
1) I would like to make this car quite fast, so a turbocharger (even dual) <br />
is not out of the question. Supercharging won't work as currently the front <br />
of the 351C goes about 3&quot; into the drivers cabinet (no space for pulleys). <br />
In SA there is not much information available on the subject of <br />
turbocharging Ford V8's. Is there a supplier in the states that sells turbo <br />
kits for old V8's, including pistons, carbs, headers, wastegates ect.<br />
<br />
2) Is the 351C a good choice for this, what about a 427/428/429/460 (bigger <br />
is better). Are these motors (and parts) readily available in the USA. If so <br />
how and where can I get one and how much will it cost approximately.<br />
<br />
3) The current g/box probably won't last long with a bigger and/or turbo <br />
engine. What would work (remember engine is rear/mid mounted)? Hewland? ZF?. <br />
Where in the States could I find (buy) one, perhaps reconditiond/rebuilt to <br />
save costs. What clutch would work?<br />
<br />
Thanks a lot<br />
<br />
Clive<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 19:42:56 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60929,60929#msg-60929</guid>
            <title>AOD Calibration (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60929,60929#msg-60929</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: KEN CANIGLIA 703-604-3900x5938 &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
I'm getting ready to re-calibrate the AOD in my 93' 5.0 GT.  I am using info<br />
from a previous re-calibration and some new information.  The area I'ld like<br />
some comments on have to do with partial power shifting and 2- 1 downshifting. <br />
I plan on making the following changes:<br />
<br />
Part-Throttle:<br />
2-3 shift valve - stiffer inner spring plus extend outer spring 1/4 inch<br />
1-2 shift valve - extend spring 1/8 -1/4 inch<br />
3-4 shift valve - extend outer spring 1/4 inch<br />
<br />
Downshift:<br />
2-1scheduling valve - shorten inner spring 1/8 inch, to reduce speed at which<br />
downshift takes place when coming to a stop, currently 20 mph.<br />
<br />
If you have any comments or experiences, please send direct.<br />
<br />
Ken Caniglia<br />
(email redacted)@INTERNET<br />
65' Mustang Fastback<br />
93' Mustang GT<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 10:50:09 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60927,60927#msg-60927</guid>
            <title>289 HiPo Pinging (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60927,60927#msg-60927</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: KEN CANIGLIA 703-604-3900x5938 &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
Doug,<br />
<br />
You need to know more about how your distributor is set up.  10 degrees of<br />
static timing is not really all that much.  Check your total timing, no vacuum.<br />
 It should be no more then around 38 degrees maximum (around 2500 rpm).  If its<br />
higher than that then check the mechnical advance in the distributor and back<br />
it off accordingly to allow the 10 or so degrees of initial advance.  Also,<br />
check your vacuum advance to see how  its operation.  I'm running a 289 with<br />
10-1 compression and 12 degrees of initial plus 26 degrees of mechanical<br />
timing.  No problems with pinging.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 11:07:31 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60925,60925#msg-60925</guid>
            <title>0-100-0 (WasCapri Info Revisited) (fwd) (5 replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60925,60925#msg-60925</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: &quot;Brian St. Denis&quot; &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
<i>&gt; Hell, I</i><br />
<i>&gt; bet and indy car or F1 car could do 0-100-0 in 10 seconds or less.</i><br />
<br />
Well, since there are Ford powered Indy cars... this response might<br />
be appropriate.<br />
<br />
I was watching a F1 race (are there any Ford F1s???) and the announcers<br />
were talking about the start.  F1 does standing starts and they mentioned<br />
that these cars do 0-100+ in 3 seconds.  If that is true, they could<br />
easily beat 0-100-0 in 10 seconds.  Try 5 or 6 (once fully warmed up).<br />
<br />
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
Brian St. Denis                 |       We need to put a ban on fertilizer.<br />
Network Administrator           |        TI e-mail: (email redacted)<br />
Paranet, Inc.                   |  Paranet e-mail: (email redacted)<br />
On loan to Texas Instruments    | MSG ID: DENT        phone: (214) 997-5270<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 23:16:47 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60924,60924#msg-60924</guid>
            <title>Ford &amp;quot;Suburban&amp;quot; (6 replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60924,60924#msg-60924</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: (email redacted) (Hugh Jackson)</b><br />
<br />
Has anyone heard of Ford's plans for their &quot;Suburban&quot;?  While we were in<br />
Dearborn last summer at the 40th anniversary convention of the T-Bird, we<br />
toured the Ford design center, and I asked about it then.  I was told that<br />
Ford was working on one, and it would be a 97 model.  No names were<br />
mentioned.  Since then, one of my local dealers has said that Ford has<br />
backed off the production. I saw in Motor Trend shortly after our trip about<br />
the Dodge Adventurer, and in that article, they mentioned the Ford unit.<br />
Since my wife drives one of the bow tie units, and I don't like it, I'm<br />
anxious for Ford to come through for me.  Appreciate any info.<br />
<br />
Hugh in Houston<br />
aka BirdMan<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 19:28:20 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60923,60923#msg-60923</guid>
            <title>Radiator deposits (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60923,60923#msg-60923</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: (email redacted) (Gaetan Corneau)</b><br />
<br />
My car's radiator is full of white, hard deposits and I begin to have <br />
cooling problems. I tried radiator cleaning stuff: it cleaned very well (the <br />
water was dark), except that the deposits stayed. Anyone knows how to get <br />
rid of that? I thought about using CLR (you know, the stuff advertized on <br />
TV, that is used to clean bath tubs) if all else fails...<br />
<br />
By the way: could anyone tell me the weight of a Mustang GT?<br />
<br />
Thanks!<br />
Gaetan Corneau<br />
Quebec, Canada<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 15:08:31 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60922,60922#msg-60922</guid>
            <title>Mustang prop vibration (2 replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60922,60922#msg-60922</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: (email redacted) (Clive Doubell)</b><br />
<br />
Hi fordnatics<br />
<br />
I'm posting this for my brother Brian, who is also a fordnatic, but alas <br />
does not currently have access to internet.<br />
<br />
He has a 1967 Mustang Coupe, converted the 289 to 302 Windsor, chucked out <br />
the auto box and shoved in 5 spd manual (Alfa Berlina box from ex race car), <br />
and put in a solid prop shaft. The problem is as such: - At 70 mph a loud <br />
vibration starts (seems to come from prop) and stops at about 85 mph. The <br />
diff and g/box is in good nick and the prop is balanced. As he found that it <br />
is quite difficult to look under the car when going 70 - 80 mph :-\ this is <br />
proving to be a difficult one to solve.<br />
<br />
Any ideas and possible solutions would be appreciated.<br />
<br />
Clive<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 19:48:56 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60919,60919#msg-60919</guid>
            <title>0-100-0 (WasCapri Info Revisited) (2 replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60919,60919#msg-60919</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: Barry Wayne Freese &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
On Wed, 24 May 1995, Eugene Y C Chu wrote:<br />
<i>&gt; Roland Zuk wrote:</i><br />
<i>&gt; </i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt;The result:  The Sierra XR4x4 2.8i and XR4x4 2.9i that ran from '85 </i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt;through '89, the Granada/Scorpio 4x4's during the same period.  And </i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt;finally (get ready to dump your 5.0), the Sierra Sapphire RS Cosworth 4x4.</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt;16 valve, turbocharged, twin cam.  In showroom trim, 220 HP @ 6250 and </i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt;220 ft-lb @ 2500 rpm.  Yes, 2500.</i><br />
<i>&gt; </i><br />
<i>&gt; Were these the same loons who built the Sierra RS200 (Evolution)?</i><br />
<i>&gt; Let's see some of the specs:  DOHC 16 valve 2.0l turbocharged 750 hp</i><br />
<i>&gt; engine, 4WD platform, 0-6 in 2.1 sec, 0-80 in 3.1 sec (first gear),</i><br />
<i>&gt; and, because it can brake harder than it can accelerate, 0-100-0 in 10</i><br />
<i>&gt; sec.  Where do I get one?</i><br />
<br />
0-100-0?  Thats Cobra territory, isn't it?  I thought part of the Cobra <br />
legend was that it was on a VERY short list of production cars which <br />
could do 0-100-0 in 10 seconds or less.  I hadn't heard about the Sierra <br />
RS200 (Evolution).  What's the deal?<br />
<br />
B. W. Freese<br />
<br />
Voice:     314 822-7637<br />
Internet:  (email redacted)<br />
<br />
'68 Mustang GT Fastback<br />
'88 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 17:44:34 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60917,60917#msg-60917</guid>
            <title>request subscription (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60917,60917#msg-60917</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: &quot;n.mulvana&quot; &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
request digest subscription<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 07:51:51 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60915,60915#msg-60915</guid>
            <title>Foam in my radiator (2 replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60915,60915#msg-60915</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: (email redacted)</b><br />
<br />
I recently put some stuff in my radiator to try and seal a leak. Car-Go I<br />
think it was called.  It seems to have worked, cuz the radiator isn't leaking<br />
anymore.  I had just flushed the cooling system and had taken out the<br />
thermostat, so I'm running without one.  I plan to get one in the next few<br />
days.  Here's the weird thing....It's still overflowing, through the overflow<br />
pipe and the radiator cap,.....but it's foam!!<br />
When I open the radiator cap and look inside, there's a layer of foam on top.<br />
 It's also foam that leaks out.  <br />
<br />
What's goin' on ?<br />
Kojo<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 08:16:38 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60913,60913#msg-60913</guid>
            <title>Timing vs Fuel Economy (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60913,60913#msg-60913</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: (email redacted) (George Chang)</b><br />
<br />
Hi Everyone,<br />
<br />
        I have another naive question for the Fordnatics... How can<br />
I tweak my timing for maximum gas mileage?  I'll be taking my<br />
'84 Crown Victoria copcar (351W, 2 VV carb, AOD, 2.7X rear end) to<br />
Southern California when I attend my son's graduation.<br />
<br />
        It will probably be my last long drive for some time, and<br />
I'd like to see just what kind of mileage I can get (I'm not going<br />
to break any speed or acceleration records, so I thought I'd go for<br />
mileage).<br />
        So far I've installed vacuum gauges on the manifold and<br />
venturi, and I find that driving style affects both readings<br />
considerably.  By keeping the manifold vacuum as high as possible, I<br />
was able to average 24.7 mpg on a 200-mile trip at about 60 mph.<br />
But now I wonder if tweaking the timing would help a bit.<br />
<br />
        What do you think?  I notice that the vacuum advance can put<br />
20 or 30 degrees of advance onto the ignition.... should I adjust<br />
the vacuum advance diaphragm spring rather that the base timing?<br />
<br />
Thanks!<br />
George<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 1995 20:38:38 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60912,60912#msg-60912</guid>
            <title>KNocking, Rattling and Power Loss!!  Oh MY!!! (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60912,60912#msg-60912</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: (email redacted)</b><br />
<br />
1973 F-250 360<br />
<br />
I need help again.  Now I'm hearing all these knocks and some sounds that<br />
seem like clattering.  Mostly when I go up any type of grade or try to<br />
accelerate.  I'm currently running without a Thermostat, but I plan to get<br />
one tommorow.  I'm still overheating too.  What to do?<br />
<br />
Kojo<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 1995 19:27:39 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60911,60911#msg-60911</guid>
            <title>Gauge sender ???? (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60911,60911#msg-60911</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: Freeway Flyer &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
I have put VDO gauges in the beast, but I need to buy the senders for the <br />
water temp and oil pressure. Does anyone know what size sender too buy <br />
for these? I guess I need the NPT size, or whatever.<br />
<br />
Thanks in advance...<br />
<br />
______________________________________________________________<br />
 Ken Neher  Emory University (but not for long!!!!!!!!!!)<br />
 BLUEBEAST- 1983 5.0 Litre Crown Victoria Police Package<br />
&quot;I am an English Major- I don't know anything.&quot;- Michael Caine <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 1995 18:25:16 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60910,60910#msg-60910</guid>
            <title>Capri Info Revisited (3 replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60910,60910#msg-60910</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: Roland Zuk &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
On Wed, 24 May 1995, Anderson, Thomas L (Tommy) wrote:<br />
<br />
<i>&gt; has been established for Fords sold in the U.K.  Among them will</i><br />
<i>&gt; be the last Capri ever produced. It was an experimental Furgeson</i><br />
<i>&gt; 4-wheel drive prototype. That  combination (if it had a turbo) would</i><br />
<i>&gt; be about the only car that could pry my stiff, white-knuckle hands off</i><br />
<i>&gt; of my 5.0 Mustang  !! So much for vaporware...  Fords Forever...!</i><br />
<br />
Vaporware???  With a hellbent &quot;beat Audi&quot; attitude, Bob Lutz, then <br />
chairman of Ford Europe; and under the direction of Rod Mansfield who <br />
formed the fabulous Dunton Special Vehicle Engineering team, kept the <br />
Ferguson Engineering projects moving full speed.<br />
<br />
The result:  The Sierra XR4x4 2.8i and XR4x4 2.9i that ran from '85 <br />
through '89, the Granada/Scorpio 4x4's during the same period.  And <br />
finally (get ready to dump your 5.0), the Sierra Sapphire RS Cosworth 4x4.<br />
<br />
16 valve, turbocharged, twin cam.  In showroom trim, 220 HP @ 6250 and <br />
220 ft-lb @ 2500 rpm.  Yes, 2500.<br />
<br />
With minor upgrades using factory RS parts (their Motorsport div), Group <br />
A trim produced easily produced 295 HP @ 6250 and 270 ft-lb @ 4500.  <br />
Aftermarket goodies could take this beast even much higher.<br />
<br />
<br />
Regards<br />
Roland<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 12:03:38 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60908,60908#msg-60908</guid>
            <title>How to analyze pinging? (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60908,60908#msg-60908</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: (email redacted) (Doug Bailey)</b><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
I have driven about 100 miles in the Cobra so far. It's doing great<br />
except that the motor pings like crazy. I originally thought that the<br />
noise was just blow-by from a poorly seated exhaust joint (it's tough <br />
to tell when the wind is howling in your ears), but now I'm sure that<br />
it's pinging.<br />
<br />
The motor is a 289 HIPO with 10:1 compression, Edelbrock manifold and<br />
Holley. It's timed to 10 degrees BTDC, which is both what's in the<br />
Mustang book for that motor and what was painted on the torsion damper<br />
by the rebuilder. I'm running 92 gas.<br />
<br />
I guess that I can stop the pinging by retarding the ignition timing,<br />
but is this really the best way to go? Where should the vacuum advance <br />
be connected. At the moment, I have it connected to some tap coming<br />
out of the center/top of the carb body, there are other taps though.<br />
<br />
Regards<br />
<br />
Doug<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 11:48:34 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60904,60904#msg-60904</guid>
            <title>Can't follow rules (LONG) (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60904,60904#msg-60904</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: (email redacted)</b><br />
<br />
Dean, I'm sorry you see all of us as idiots, and I mean you no ill will by<br />
this response, but you shoud consider my responses here.<br />
<br />
First regarding:<br />
<br />
<i>&gt; &gt; From: chucko</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; To: fordnatics; internet</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; Subject: ...cant follow rules</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; Date: Tuesday, May 23, 1995 8:27AM</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; &gt;Subject: ADMIN: *Don't* send unsubscribe messages to the list!!</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; &gt;For the N+1th time: DO NOT send &quot;unsubscribe&quot; requests to the list</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; &gt;posting address!  They will be ignored by the list admin (me) and will</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; &gt;only piss off all readers of the list.</i><br />
<br />
YOU WRITE:<br />
<br />
<i>&gt;&gt;&gt;I assume that this was from Chuck&lt;&lt;&lt;</i><br />
<br />
Come on Dean - if you have a computer and you are using e-mail, you shouldn't<br />
have to assume who it's from.  Surely you know how to wade through headers<br />
and determine who originally sent a post.<br />
<br />
If you don't know that chucko is Chuck Fry (sp?) - administrator of the list,<br />
then you really haven't been doing much on the list.  It is not Chuck's<br />
responsibility to babysit everyone here.  This list isn't a _right_.  It's a<br />
_priveledge_.  And much like any other priveledges, it comes with some<br />
responsibility.  It is your responsiblity to learn the rules of the road - so<br />
to speak, and follow them.<br />
<br />
You also write:<br />
<br />
<i>&gt;&gt;Maybe they ARE having a problem.  Maybe, as can happen were I work, someone</i><br />
inherits a system that the previous owner had subscribed to a mailing<br />
list(s)...how is he to know how to get off of the list????&lt;&lt;<br />
<br />
Well, first off, if a member walks away from an address that is on the list<br />
without un-subscribing, he or she isn't very concientious to begin with.<br />
 However, in the incredibly unlikely event that I inherited an address that<br />
was subscribed to a Basketweaving (no offense to any basket weavers) list,<br />
and I wanted to un-subscribe, then perhaps I might post a message saying &quot;Hi,<br />
I am sorry to clutter the list, but I have inherited a system that is on this<br />
list, and I am unfamiliar with how to un-subscribe, could someone please help<br />
me.&quot;  I doubt this would get you flamed.  However, simply posting an<br />
unsubscribe to ANY list is irritating and happens a LOT here lately.<br />
<br />
Regarding MY reply to:<br />
<br />
<i>&gt;&gt; If the rest of the list feels as these guys does, then take me off</i><br />
<i>&gt;&gt;the list too!&lt;&lt;</i><br />
<br />
That said:<br />
<br />
<i>&gt;You'll need to send that to fordnatics-request I believe.  &lt;g&gt;</i><br />
<br />
You write:<br />
<br />
<i>&gt;&gt;You were the one that thoroughly convinced me.  I hope you feel better now.</i><br />
 Real good job!  &lt;no g&gt; &lt;&lt;<br />
<br />
Glad I could be of assistance.<br />
<br />
Regarding SOMEONE ELSES post of:<br />
<br />
<i>&gt;&gt;The way to get on or off of this list has not changed since its conception.</i><br />
 What is so confusing about that?&lt;&lt;<br />
<br />
You write:<br />
<br />
<i>&gt;&gt;Smart aleck!  The way they have been changing servers, then temporary</i><br />
servers, but still do this here or you could also do that............I would <br />
have to go back and re-read all the change messages I have saved to determine<br />
what has changed and what hasn't.  Gees, the messages we get now come<br />
from &quot;Chucko&quot;.  Wasn't it &quot;Fordnatics&quot; just a short time ago?&lt;&lt;<br />
<br />
What difference does it make what changes have been made.  You still post<br />
messages to Fordnatics and subscription changes/cancellations to<br />
Fordnatics-request.  What's smart aleck about that?<br />
<br />
<i>&gt;&gt;ALSO, I was (am) subscribed to the mustang list.  They made a server</i><br />
change.  I decided to take &quot;digest&quot; form.  BIG MISTAKE!  The digest crashed<br />
my mail.  Three times more before I could get mail to run long  enough to go<br />
re-read &quot;how-to&quot; e-mail, then trial and error, and finally get cancelled and<br />
back to receiving regular mailings!!!!  I was almost to the point of sending<br />
a message to the posting site.&lt;&lt;<br />
<br />
That's a shame - the proper way to handle this would have been to post a<br />
polite message to Chucko (even if it actually required you to look up his<br />
address) letting him know of the problem and asking him if he could check it<br />
out when he got a chance.<br />
<br />
You act as if Chuck is getting paid to do this or something.  Further, you<br />
act as if the list is here to serve you only.  You certainly seem to think<br />
that you have no responsiblity for understanding how it works, or what the<br />
list might require of you.<br />
<br />
If you inherited it, I have to wonder about your organization's policies that<br />
re-use old e-mail names.  If you _subscribed_ to a list that can generate<br />
over 50 messages a day without reading the charter, or thinking that you<br />
might have to actually do some work to manage the incoming messages then you<br />
are, at the very least, being naive.<br />
<br />
<i>&gt;&gt;The guy may have actually been a lazy bum and didn't even look for (or have</i><br />
saved) mailing list instructions, but having been through this crap, I say<br />
give the guy a break and cool out, dude!&lt;&lt;<br />
<br />
The problem is that there have been a LOT of people ignoring the proper<br />
method of un-subscribing.  Obviously I am wasting bandwidth here, but<br />
hopefully it will lower the wasted bandwidth in the future by raising the<br />
awareness of others when they need to make changes.<br />
<br />
 -Tom Steele<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 1995 15:31:10 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60901,60901#msg-60901</guid>
            <title>1989 Motor Trend Super Coupe/XR7  Articles (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60901,60901#msg-60901</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: Barry Wayne Freese &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
I am interested in the 1989 articles in Motor Trend on the Car of the <br />
Year: Thunderbird Super Coupe, and the Cougar XR7.<br />
<br />
If anyone has these, I'd appreciate working out something where I could <br />
get a copy.  (My local library has a very good service on periodicals, <br />
but for some reason the service missed this year of Motor Trend articles <br />
so I can't get them from the archieves!)<br />
<br />
Thanks, in advance!  :-&gt;<br />
<br />
B. W. Freese<br />
<br />
Voice:     314 822-7637<br />
Internet:  (email redacted)<br />
<br />
'68 Mustang GT Fastback<br />
'88 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 1995 13:32:17 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60899,60899#msg-60899</guid>
            <title>fixing wheels (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60899,60899#msg-60899</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: &quot; Darius Rudis                                                             &quot; &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
                                                                               <br />
I had a wheel with the same problem.  I took it to:                            <br />
THE WHEEL SHOPPE                                                               <br />
18011 E. 14 MILE                                                               <br />
FRASER MI 48026                                                                <br />
(810)415-7171                                                                  <br />
                                                                               <br />
They are basically in metro Detroit.  They charged me $40 to straighten my     <br />
wheel.  Since I live in metro Detroit it was a 45 minute drive.  Mailing it    <br />
would probably work.  They advertise in the 3x3 ads in the back of some of the <br />
magazines.                                                                     <br />
                                                                               <br />
Regards,                                                                       <br />
Darius Rudis                               (email redacted)                <br />
FM&amp;SP - Systems                                                                <br />
Room 219-B Westpark Center Dearborn (313)85-50209                              <br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 1995 09:41:28 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60894,60894#msg-60894</guid>
            <title>...cant follow rules  (TAKE ME OFF LIST!!!) (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60894,60894#msg-60894</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: &quot;Knight, Dean E&quot; &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
<br />
All,<br />
<br />
This is long!<br />
<br />
Before I begin.....hey, Chucko, if you read this...TAKE ME OFF<br />
THIS LIST!!!!! (unsubscribe me, that is!).  I am serious and will<br />
try to follow with the proper unsubscribe request. (no smiley)<br />
<br />
Although I did receive e-mail in support of what I posted, a couple<br />
of others, who know more than anyone else, and are shocked<br />
when the rest of the world is not at their level, have convinced<br />
me that I can not  continue as a subscriber to this group.<br />
<br />
MORE BELOW<br />
 I   I  I   I<br />
 v v v v<br />
<br />
 ----------<br />
<i>&gt; From: chucko</i><br />
<i>&gt; To: 'Fords-Post'</i><br />
<i>&gt; Subject: RE: ...cant follow rules</i><br />
<i>&gt; Date: Tuesday, May 23, 1995 10:29AM</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
ME&gt; While we are wasting bandwith.............<br />
<i>&gt;  ----------</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; From: chucko</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; To: fordnatics; internet</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; Subject: ...cant follow rules</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; Date: Tuesday, May 23, 1995 8:27AM</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; &gt;Subject: ADMIN: *Don't* send unsubscribe messages to the list!!</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; &gt;For the N+1th time: DO NOT send &quot;unsubscribe&quot; requests to the list</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; &gt;posting address!  They will be ignored by the list admin (me) and will</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; &gt;only piss off all readers of the list.</i><br />
<br />
I assume that this was from Chuck.  It might behoove you to just<br />
re-send request instructions to people like this directly, instead of <br />
blasting<br />
them openly.  Maybe they ARE having a problem.  Maybe, as can happen<br />
were I work, someone inherits a system that the previous owner had<br />
subscribed to a mailing list(s)...how is he to know how to get off of the <br />
list????<br />
Especially if the post is &quot;ignored&quot;!<br />
<br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; I am tired of reading *unsuscribe* postings left and right...</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; I have an idea.  The next person sending the request should get a </i><br />
posting<br />
<i>&gt; &gt; from</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; every single one of us who have to read it.  Contact the idiot</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; PRIVATELY letting them know how many times we have to read these stupid</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; things.</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; The person unsubscribing should probably receive about 400+ messages </i><br />
from<br />
<i>&gt; &gt; everyone on this list!</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; Regards,</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; Darius Rudis                               (email redacted)</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; FM&amp;SP - Systems</i><br />
<i>&gt; &gt; Room 219-B Westpark Center Dearborn (313)85-50209</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
me&gt; If the rest of the list feels as these guys do, then take me off the <br />
list<br />
me&gt; too!<br />
me&gt; What an attitude.  I believe most mailers have a delete and also show<br />
me&gt; the heading so you can choose to read or not to read.  Like how much<br />
me&gt; time does it waist.  I delete MOST of the postings from this and other<br />
me&gt; mailing lists without reading the post by perusing the headers to see if<br />
me&gt; the topic interests me.<br />
me&gt;<br />
me&gt; BESIDES.....trying to get on and off of some mailing lists requires an <br />
act<br />
me&gt; of congress!  The requester might have been doing a last resort after<br />
me&gt; trying to &quot;follow the rules&quot;.  This mailing list has done a lot of <br />
changes<br />
me&gt; recently.  Enough to confuse anybody.<br />
me&gt;<br />
me&gt; Dean<br />
<br />
 ----------------------------[ 1 Non-supporter <br />
]-------------------------------------------------<br />
<i>&gt;Actually Dean, in spite of the changes, I still post to the same </i><br />
fordnatics.<br />
<i>&gt;address I have been the whole time, and if I were to unsubscr*be, I would</i><br />
<i>&gt;post to the same fordnatics-request that has been asked of us since I have</i><br />
<i>&gt;been on the list.</i><br />
<br />
See my response to #3 below..........<br />
<br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt;All things considered, I don't think the list could have been handled </i><br />
better,<br />
<i>&gt;or with less inconvience to the list-members than Chuck has done.</i><br />
<br />
When was this even brought up?????  I'VE never questioned Chuck's<br />
ability to administer the list.<br />
<br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt;BTW - regarding:</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt;&gt; If the rest of the list feels as these guys does, then take me off</i><br />
<i>&gt;&gt;the list too!&lt;&lt;</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt;You'll need to send that to fordnatics-request I believe.  &lt;g&gt;</i><br />
<br />
You were the one that thoroughly convinced me.  I hope you feel better<br />
now.  Real good job!  &lt;no g&gt;<br />
<br />
 ----------------------------[ Non-supporter 2 <br />
]-------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
<i>&gt;Is it really complicated to add &quot;-request&quot; into the address?</i><br />
<br />
Depends on circumstances...have you tried cancelling or changing<br />
your subscription yet?......see below......<br />
<br />
 ----------------------------[ Non-supporter 3 <br />
]-------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
 | If the rest of the list feels as these guys does, then take me off the <br />
list<br />
<i>&gt; | too!</i><br />
<i>&gt; | What an attitude.</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt; I am sure that you feel very strongly about this. If so, then if you had</i><br />
<i>&gt; read the top of the post, subscription cancellations do not go to the </i><br />
list,<br />
<i>&gt; they go to (email redacted)</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt;   I believe most mailers have a delete and also show</i><br />
<i>&gt; | the heading so you can choose to read or not to read.  Like how much</i><br />
<i>&gt; | time does it waist.</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt; This has nothing to do with looking at headers. I should not have to look </i><br />
to<br />
<i>&gt; see if a message was supposed to be sent to the list or not. I am </i><br />
interested<br />
<i>&gt; in every message to the list. And what has this to do with my waistline?</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt;   I delete MOST of the postings from this and other</i><br />
<i>&gt; | mailing lists without reading the post by perusing the headers to see if</i><br />
<i>&gt; | the topic interests me.</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt; That is you.</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt; | BESIDES.....trying to get on and off of some mailing lists requires an </i><br />
act<br />
<i>&gt; | of congress!  The requester might have been doing a last resort after</i><br />
<i>&gt; | trying to &quot;follow the rules&quot;.  This mailing list has done a lot of </i><br />
changes<br />
<i>&gt; | recently.  Enough to confuse anybody.</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<i>&gt; The way to get on or off of this list has not changed since its </i><br />
conception.<br />
<i>&gt; What is so confusing about that?</i><br />
<i>&gt;</i><br />
<br />
MY E-MAIL RESPONSE BACK TO HIM:<br />
Smart aleck!  The way they have been changing servers, then temporary<br />
servers, but still do this here or you could also do that............I would <br />
have<br />
to go back and re-read all the change messages I have saved to determine<br />
what has changed and what hasn't.  Gees, the messages we get now come<br />
from &quot;Chucko&quot;.  Wasn't it &quot;Fordnatics&quot; just a short time ago?<br />
<br />
ALSO, I was (am) subscribed to the mustang list.  They made a server<br />
change.  I decided to take &quot;digest&quot; form.  BIG MISTAKE!  The digest<br />
crashed my mail.  Three times more before I could get mail to run long <br />
enough<br />
to go re-read &quot;how-to&quot; e-mail, then trial and error, and finally get <br />
cancelled<br />
and back to receiving regular mailings!!!!  I was almost to the point of<br />
sending a message to the posting site.<br />
<br />
I may not be quite as smart as you, but I'm not totally illiterate and can <br />
usually<br />
follow directions well.  The guy may have actually been a lazy bum and<br />
didn't even look for (or have saved) mailing list instructions, but having<br />
been through this crap, I say give the guy a break and cool out, dude! <br />
 There<br />
are a lot better things to get excited about.<br />
<br />
 ----------------------------[ A supporter <br />
]-------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
<i>&gt;You're absolutely correct. I should have thought before typing when I</i><br />
<i>&gt;responded in agreement to this suggestion.</i><br />
<br />
Maybe it does sometimes rain in the desert.  Thanks!<br />
___________________________________________________________<br />
<br />
How many flamethrowers out their have tried to cancel or make a change<br />
to this or any other mailing group?  I know some of you are near perfect and<br />
know and understand everything to the fullest, but someone else out their<br />
has had to have had a problem or made a mistake with a mailing list request.<br />
At least one.  Maybe not as you have probably chased them all off!!!!!<br />
<br />
Nevertheless, I out of here (providing I can read the instructions).  If you <br />
care<br />
to respond,  you'd better e-mail me direct.<br />
<br />
It's been real,<br />
Dean<br />
<br />
(email redacted)<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 1995 15:49:29 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60893,60893#msg-60893</guid>
            <title>Capri Info Revisited (Lengthy) (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60893,60893#msg-60893</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: &quot;Anderson, Thomas L (Tommy)&quot; &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
    Last week someone asked for some specs on the German Ford<br />
Capri (actually Mercury Capri to U.S. buyers). I'm running about a<br />
week behind in everything these days, so I hope it's not too late for<br />
the person who was looking for the information.<br />
<br />
    According to the March 1976 Car &amp; Driver reprint article that<br />
Mercury dealers were giving out (the Capri &quot;S&quot; was tested) to<br />
prospective buyers (it helped sell me, they also were giving out<br />
reprints of a 1975 Road &amp; Track test which I still have, also)<br />
horsepower was 109bhp @ 4800 RPM, torque was 146ft-lbs @<br />
3000 RPM. Not exactly a powerhouse by today's standards, but<br />
they did alright. It managed to stomp a '75 Buick Skyhawk (Auto.),<br />
a VW Scirroco, and was just barely beat out by a Cosworth V*ga<br />
in the quarter mile by about 2 tenths of a second. Zero to 60 was<br />
given at 10.3 seconds and top speed was put at 113 mph. But they<br />
could be easily tweaked to do more. With mild engine mods (cam,<br />
carb, etc,) I've seen mine on 125 mph before the speedometer<br />
broke...  [;).  I estimated when it was as it's peak, the quarter mile<br />
time would have been in the high 16's judging from other cars I<br />
knew I could hang with or beat.<br />
<br />
    The original writer mentioned he was looking for a 2.8 injection<br />
Capri. Sad to say these were never imported into the U.S. , but<br />
they could flex a bit more muscle. According to &quot;Capri Muscle Cars&quot;<br />
(Brooklands Books) quarter mile time was 16.2 seconds and 0 to 60<br />
came up in 7.9 seconds. Horsepower was 160bhp (DIN) @ 5700 rpm<br />
and torque was 162 ft-lbs @ 4200 rpm. In the particular test of Autocar<br />
Magazine June 1981, the 2.8 Injection Capri consistantly beat the<br />
likes of Porche 924, Mazda RX7, Audi Coupe, Lancia Beta HPE 2000,<br />
and Datsun 280ZX  2+2 (which was slowest of the bunch, dog meat !)<br />
in quarter mile times and top speed. Top speed was put at 127 for the<br />
Capri 2.8i. The article says &quot;with  gutsy performance for tolerable<br />
economy it has to be the Ford&quot;  !!<br />
<br />
    On that same vein, I saw in Super Ford where a Brittish Museum<br />
has been established for Fords sold in the U.K.  Among them will<br />
be the last Capri ever produced. It was an experimental Furgeson<br />
4-wheel drive prototype. That  combination (if it had a turbo) would<br />
be about the only car that could pry my stiff, white-knuckle hands off<br />
of my 5.0 Mustang  !! So much for vaporware...  Fords Forever...!<br />
<br />
                  Tommy Anderson<br />
                   (email redacted)<br />
<br />
                 1977 Mercury Capri II 2.8<br />
                 1978 Ford Ranchero GT 351W<br />
                 1983 Thunderbird 302<br />
                 1989 Mustang GT 25TH Aniv. Ed.<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 1995 09:40:00 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60891,60891#msg-60891</guid>
            <title>Tail light lens replace on a '93 hatch (2 replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60891,60891#msg-60891</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: &quot;Rimmer, Paul&quot; &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
<br />
Thanks for everyone's reply regarding the rear tail light lens replacement. <br />
 The lens is the same from '87 on up however the way the tail light assembly <br />
is attached to the car is different between an '87 and a '93.<br />
<br />
I picked up a very clean right side assembly off an '87 from a wreckers <br />
yard.  It cost me $135 Cdn.  This seemed like a lot but the dealer wanted <br />
$142 for just the lens.  Also PPI has the whole assembly, brand new, for $89 <br />
US.  This would have been the way to go if I was in the States.<br />
<br />
Anyway,  it took 15 mins to remove the assembly with the smashed lens from <br />
my car.  This involved removing 5 screws from the panel running around the <br />
interior behind the tail light.  One of the screws is hidden beneath the <br />
carpet in the spare tire well area.  Then five 11mm nuts are removed which <br />
hold the assembly to the body.<br />
<br />
I then compared the 2 assemblies and found that the '93 assembly has screws <br />
at all attachment points while the '87 has screw and threaded (3 male, 2 <br />
female) attachment points.  I checked the part number of the lenses and <br />
found them to be the same.  It was then an easy process to CAREFULLY pry off <br />
the two lenses (use a flat screwdriver with tape around the blade) and put <br />
the good one on the '93 assembly.  There are 5 clip retainers on the '87 and <br />
4 on the '93 which can be reused.  The butyl seal and clips hold the lens <br />
onto the assembly.<br />
<br />
Take the time to really clean the lens if you use one from a wrecker.  These <br />
things get dirty and will result in one tail light being dimmer than the <br />
other.<br />
<br />
**  IMPORTANT **  DO NOT clean the silvered reflective surfaces of the <br />
taillight assemblies with anything other than a slightly damp cloth.  I was <br />
lucky to find this out on the old assembly which I cleaned with Windex.  The <br />
Windex acted as a solvent and removed the reflective finish with ease.<br />
<br />
I then reattached the assembly using silicone sealer around the attachments <br />
to prevent any leakage into the trunk.<br />
<br />
The whole process took a half hour and was quite simple.<br />
<br />
QUESTION<br />
I now need to get a 2&quot; long, 1/4&quot; wide divot in the corner of the rear <br />
bumper cover fixed.  Can this be fixed on the car and does the cover have to <br />
be removed, or can they not be repaired necessitating the replacement of the <br />
cover ?<br />
<br />
Thanks for the help everyone.<br />
<br />
Paul Rimmer<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 1995 17:18:01 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60890,60890#msg-60890</guid>
            <title>New Ford Pickup (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60890,60890#msg-60890</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: &quot;Dan. Jones&quot; &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
Peter,<br />
<br />
Thanks for the tip on the shims.  Your mention of too-tall-trucks reminded <br />
me that the home of the Bigfoot monster trucks is just down the street <br />
from me.  About a month ago I was talking with one of the mechanics there <br />
and he showed me some pictures of the new production F-150.   The front<br />
grill and sloping hood are similar to the Triton show truck but the sides<br />
are smoother.  The doors on the crew cab are kind of interesting, with one<br />
side opening &quot;suicide&quot; style for easy entry and loading.  Underhood is the<br />
4.6 liter modular motor and the front suspension is fully independent <br />
(the twin I-beam swing axles are retained for the heavier duty F-250/F-350<br />
trucks).  They already had a composite replica of the new body in the shop <br />
to fit to one of there monster truck frames.<br />
<br />
                                                  Later,<br />
                                                  Dan Jones <br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 1995 10:19:00 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60887,60887#msg-60887</guid>
            <title>Running Hot ! (4 replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60887,60887#msg-60887</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: Bryan Diller &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
I was wondering if anybody had an ideas or solutions on how to keep<br />
the 428 in our dirt track car cool.  It usually runs about 220 degrees,<br />
maybe a little higher, we'd like to see it about 200, any ideas would be<br />
appreciated.  I do remember a little while back some discussion about<br />
some  product that you put in the radiator with the water to help with the<br />
temp, I believe that the thread had something to do with anti-rust agents<br />
for the radiator. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 1995 12:19:33 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60885,60885#msg-60885</guid>
            <title>Stroker Cyl Bore Life? (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60885,60885#msg-60885</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: (email redacted) (Frank Marrone)</b><br />
<br />
The bottom of the piston sticks out the bore ~.85&quot; at BDC, this is approx<br />
1/3 of the total piston hieght.  Approximately .1&quot; of piston pin appears<br />
below the bore skirt.  The piston wobbles (alarmingly but probably<br />
appropriatly) at BDC with no rings.  The piston to bore clearence is under<br />
.002&quot; cold. <br />
<br />
The rod is straight up and down at BDC and the cylinder pressure should be<br />
low.  What would the service life limitations of such a beast be?  Are there<br />
any close examples (chevy 400?) to make a comparison to? <br />
Frank Marrone at (email redacted)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 1995 22:31:00 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60883,60883#msg-60883</guid>
            <title>Power Steering rate (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60883,60883#msg-60883</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: Joe Dowding &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
   I would like to decrease the power assistance on my 1978 Mustang II.  <br />
I have the variable assist rack with the newer style power steering <br />
pump.  I would like to decrease the assistance and get rid of that 'old <br />
car' feel.  It is overpowered enough that I would consider putting my <br />
manual rack back in, but turning my front tires (215 60 R 14's) while <br />
parking would not be pleasant.  I have heard of problems with slowing <br />
down the pump (bigger pulley) but is there a limit you can go to before <br />
the problems occur?  I have also heard of modifications you can make to <br />
the rack itself.  What are they?  Thanks for any help with this.<br />
<br />
 - Joe Dowding <br />
  (email redacted)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 1995 21:23:59 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60878,60878#msg-60878</guid>
            <title>Shims (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60878,60878#msg-60878</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: Dan Jones &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
Hi All,<br />
<br />
Does anyone know a good source for the wedge shaped shims used to adjust <br />
the pinion angle on leaf sprung cars (they lay flush against the spring <br />
perches)?  I need to fine tune the driveline phasing on my '66 Mustang.  <br />
It's as smooth as silk under hard acceleration, but has some vibration <br />
upon deceleration.   <br />
                                               Thanks,<br />
                                               Dan Jones<br />
<br />
P.S. Due to severe storms and flooding here in St. Louis, the local computer<br />
network has been down since Tuesday a week ago.  All mail sent to my address <br />
during the past week has been lost.  If you sent me anything during this <br />
period, please re-send.<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 1995 12:37:06 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60875,60875#msg-60875</guid>
            <title>leaf spring suggestions (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60875,60875#msg-60875</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: Christopher S Whalley &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
<br />
	I would like to lower the rear end and increase the spring rate of my <br />
63 Ranchero.  I do not want to de arch the springs and I would prefer not to <br />
use lowering blocks.  <br />
	I would appreciate suggestions concerning suppliers and available <br />
spring rates.  I would like a fairly stiff rate since this is a lowered <br />
car with no rear anti roll bar that will occasionally be carrying a load.<br />
	Assuming 650 lb/in front springs with a ~1 in front AR bar, what <br />
would be a good rear spring rate.  I would like fairly neutral cornering <br />
with 215 60's in front and 245 60's in back.<br />
	Could someone also tell me the measurements to do a Shelby style <br />
upper A arm relocation.<br />
	Do the &quot;wedge&quot; kits require relocating the A arm mounts.<br />
Thanks<br />
Chris Whalley<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 1995 16:51:36 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60873,60873#msg-60873</guid>
            <title>CFV: Mustang Newsgroup (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60873,60873#msg-60873</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: Shel Belinkoff &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
<br />
                          LAST CALL FOR VOTES (of 2)<br />
               unmoderated group rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang<br />
<br />
Newsgroups line:<br />
rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang	Ford Mustangs in all their flavours.<br />
<br />
Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC, 2 June 1995.<br />
<br />
This vote is being conducted by a neutral third party. For voting<br />
questions only contact Michael Handler &lt;(email redacted)&gt;. For<br />
questions about the proposed group contact John Shannon &lt;(email redacted)&gt;.<br />
<br />
RATIONALE<br />
<br />
Given the popularity of the vehicle and the associated traffic in other<br />
groups, Mustang enthusiasts have expressed the need for a group<br />
dedicated to the Mustang.  This would centralize Mustang information,<br />
removing the traffic from the other groups.  In addition, a single<br />
Mustang group would allow new Mustang-interested users to easily<br />
identify what group to monitor/post to, to acquire information.<br />
The name rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang is inline with current Usenet<br />
practices.<br />
<br />
CHARTER<br />
<br />
rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang is intended to be an unmoderated<br />
newsgroup to support discussion amongst Ford Mustang enthusiasts.<br />
Discussion will include, but not be limited to, repairs, modifications,<br />
upgrades, notices, opinions, advice and experiences from individuals<br />
that have an interest in the Ford Mustang automobile in its various<br />
flavours.  Advertising, for-sale notices and want-ads are acceptable<br />
as long as they are in-keeping with the Mustang theme.<br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION<br />
<br />
This Call For Votes (CFV) has been crossposted to the following newsgroups:<br />
news.announce.newgroups, news.groups, rec.autos.misc, rec.autos.tech<br />
rec.autos.driving, rec.autos.rod-n-custom, rec.autos.sport.tech,<br />
alt.autos.rod-n-custom<br />
<br />
HOW TO VOTE<br />
<br />
One vote counted per person, no more than one per account. Attempts at<br />
ballot box stuffing or vote fraud will not be treated lightly.<br />
<br />
*** IMPORTANT: _Addresses_ and _votes_ of all voters will be published in<br />
the final voting results list. UVV voting on Usenet is not done by secret<br />
ballot. ***<br />
<br />
Send email to: &lt;(email redacted)&gt;<br />
Just replying should work if you are not reading this on a mailing list.<br />
<br />
Your mail message should contain ONE (and only ONE) of the following<br />
statements:<br />
<br />
      I vote YES on rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang<br />
      I vote NO on rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang<br />
      I vote ABSTAIN on rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang<br />
      I CANCEL my vote on rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang<br />
<br />
If you vote ABSTAIN, your vote will be registered and will be shown in<br />
the final results posting, but it will not affect the outcome of the vote.<br />
It is intended as a form of symbolic protest, nothing more.<br />
<br />
If you CANCEL your vote, all records of your vote will be purged from the<br />
active results file, and your name and address will not be listed in the<br />
final results posting.<br />
<br />
ABSTAIN and CANCEL are nearly the same thing -- the only difference is<br />
that with ABSTAIN, your name and address are still listed in the final<br />
listing.<br />
<br />
If you later change your mind you may vote again. Only your last valid<br />
vote will count and will be published in the final results posting.<br />
<br />
Anything else may be rejected by the automatic vote counting program.  The<br />
votetaker will respond to your received ballots with a personal<br />
acknowledgement by mail -- if you do not receive one within several days,<br />
try again. It's your responsibility to make sure your vote is registered<br />
correctly.<br />
<br />
After the final results are posted to &lt;news.announce.newgroups&gt;, there<br />
will then be a five-day period during which the published vote list may be<br />
corrected and any irregularities addressed.<br />
<br />
OFFICIAL SOURCES OF THE CFV<br />
<br />
The only official sources of this CFV are:<br />
* The copy which was crossposted to &lt;news.announce.newgroups&gt;<br />
* Any copies which were sent to mailing lists by the votetaker (and *only*<br />
  the votetaker)<br />
* One received from the votetaker's automated mailserver<br />
<br />
To obtain a copy of the CFV from the votetaker's mailserver:<br />
* Send email to &lt;(email redacted)&gt; with<br />
<br />
  Subject: send mustang cfv<br />
<br />
  This is an automated function, so it does not matter what<br />
  your message body contains, as long as the Subject: line is exactly as<br />
  described above.<br />
<br />
IMPORTANT: If you give anyone copies of the CFV, the copies must be whole<br />
and unmodified. Distributing pre-filled in ballots or modified copies of<br />
this CFV is considered voting fraud. If this occurs on a large scale or<br />
causes voting problems or irregularities, the vote may be canceled.<br />
<br />
When in doubt, ask the votetaker.<br />
<br />
rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang Bounce List - No need to revote<br />
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
(email redacted)                                          Ryan J Snodgrass<br />
(email redacted)                                          Vijoy A. Abraham<br />
(email redacted)                                  Bradley Wosmek<br />
- --<br />
                 Michael Handler &lt;(email redacted)&gt;<br />
        Usenet Volunteer Votetakers (UVV) Running UseVote 3.0<br />
Usenet Volunteer Votetakers WWW page: &lt;URL:amdahl.com/ext/uvv/&gt;<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 1995 16:06:08 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60870,60870#msg-60870</guid>
            <title>cooling system problem solved (4 replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60870,60870#msg-60870</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: &quot;Brian St. Denis&quot; &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
You may remember that on my 1993 GT the temperature gauge started<br />
reading 1 mark lower than normal one day.  What's up with that?<br />
Maybe the thermostat was stuck closed.<br />
<br />
I replaced the thermostat and it didn't change the gauge reading.<br />
I replaced the thermostat again with no change.  I then tested my<br />
thermostats with a thermometer (thanks Robert King) and they were<br />
working fine.<br />
<br />
Hum.  Suggestions I got from the list ranged from try more thermostats<br />
to the gauge just going bad.<br />
<br />
The other day I replaced my ECT (engine coolant temperature sensor)<br />
with a buddy's (thanks Mike Herrmann) just because it was easy and<br />
his perfectly clean 1992 LX was right there with the hood up.  Bingo,<br />
problem fixed.<br />
<br />
This also explains the crappy gas mileage I've been getting.  Running<br />
in warm up mode all day every day isn't good on the gas bill.  It<br />
may also explain the lack of performance I have been thinking I'm getting.<br />
<br />
Parts stores don't seem to carry ECTs.  The dealership was closed so<br />
I still don't have a new one.<br />
<br />
Ever heard of an ECT going bad?<br />
<br />
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
Brian St. Denis                 |       We need to put a ban on fertilizer.<br />
Network Administrator           |        TI e-mail: (email redacted)<br />
Paranet, Inc.                   |  Paranet e-mail: (email redacted)<br />
On loan to Texas Instruments    | MSG ID: DENT        phone: (214) 997-5270<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 1995 21:40:18 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60868,60868#msg-60868</guid>
            <title>Smashed rear lamp lens (4 replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60868,60868#msg-60868</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: &quot;Rimmer, Paul&quot; &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
<br />
The right rear lamp lens on my '93 LX was smashed yesterday.  Ford wants <br />
$142 Canadian.  Does anyone know if these are the same from '87 on up ?  If <br />
so I will try to get one from a wreckers yard.<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 1995 11:29:40 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60867,60867#msg-60867</guid>
            <title>Wheel problem (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60867,60867#msg-60867</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: (email redacted) (Robert King)</b><br />
<br />
   I've got a problem with a set of Fittipaldi wheels I bought a few weeks<br />
ago used.  It turns out that one of the wheels is bent.  The plain of the<br />
rim is not parallel to the plane of the hub.  When the wheel rotates, the<br />
rim oscillates a bit over 1/8&quot;.  (Not that the wheel is NOT out of round,<br />
it just wobbles back-and-forth as it rotates.)<br />
<br />
   What I need to know is if this can be repaired, and if it can, I need<br />
some shop recomendations.<br />
<br />
- -- Robert King<br />
<br />
<br />
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+<br />
| Robert A. King                |                                       |<br />
| Systems Software Engineer     |        &quot;Dulce et decorum est en       |<br />
| Kodak Health Imaging Systems  |        medio coitu mori&quot;              |<br />
| (email redacted)            |                 -- Nelson Rockefeller |<br />
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+<br />
| The opinions expressed here ain't even mine, much less my employer's! |<br />
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 1995 12:31:25 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60864,60864#msg-60864</guid>
            <title>suspension bolts (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60864,60864#msg-60864</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: &quot;Theodore A. Chen&quot; &lt;(email redacted)&gt;</b><br />
<br />
<br />
having recently acquired a set of rear control arms, i've been trying<br />
to find the bolts for putting them in.  i could reuse the ones that<br />
are on the car right now, but since the car will be heading to the<br />
track soon, i'd feel more comfortable replacing them.  i have tried<br />
several ford dealers and come up with nothing.  the parts guy at<br />
fremont ford (an SVO dealer) said they didn't even have a part number<br />
for the bolts.  he showed me his computer screen which displayed the <br />
various parts of the rear suspension, and sure enough, there was no <br />
part number for the bolts.  he said they just reuse them and that <br />
they've never had any of them break.<br />
<br />
he then suggested that i try a hardware store.  just to see, i went<br />
to Pep Boys and found the bolts i needed (M12, 1.75 x 110, grade 10.9).<br />
but then i asked myself which ones i would rather have in my car,<br />
the ford grade 8.8 bolts already in there, or the grade 10.9 bolts of<br />
uncertain origin?<br />
<br />
i'm concerned about getting counterfeit bolts and losing my rear<br />
suspension at the track, so i'd appreciate any help i can get in<br />
finding some bolts.<br />
<br />
do the ford bolts really exist as parts?<br />
<br />
 -teddy<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 1995 10:37:02 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60861,60861#msg-60861</guid>
            <title>9&amp;quot; pumpkins (5 replies)</title>
            <link>http://www.fordfirst.com/phorum/read.php?13,60861,60861#msg-60861</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This read-only message was archived from a public mail list.<br />
<b>Mail From: (email redacted) (Doug Bailey)</b><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
I'm planning to replace the rear end on my Cobra. It's currently<br />
a little over 3:1 and I would like to replace it with a 4.11:1 Posi<br />
rear end.<br />
<br />
Does anyone know whether I can get away with just replacing the <br />
pumpkin or do I have to replace the whole rear axel? My understanding<br />
is that, to replace the pumpkin, all I have to do is open the diff <br />
cover, remove the halfshaft clips and pull the halfshafts out.<br />
I then unbolt the pumpkin, replace with the new-one etc.<br />
<br />
Are there any gotchas (Posi doesn't fit in non-posi casing, posi<br />
halfshaft splines are different or shorter etc..)?<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mailbot</dc:creator>
            <category>Fordnatics List Archive</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 15:36:59 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
